Comments on: Kate Middleton’s Royal Roots Revealed

By: elizabeth w

elizabeth w — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:45:04 +0000

subjects exspect the best and yet respect ones chioce within the law.KATE IS NOT SUITABLE IN LEANAGE OR HER VIRTUES.I HOPE THEY START TO WAKE .

By: elizabeth w

elizabeth w — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:42:47 +0000

so desperate they would even acceppt a none royal unholy woman in virtues verses a virtues blueblood .when find it.what ashame to lie about a woman with no blood lines and /or class.waste of tax payers money for a faux history of royal connection.haven’t the subject suffered enough on stupid lies to in coporated a non royal.thier children wouldn’t be on the throne like the rest who marry sltts or unholy people with non respects of life .god and comman man and woman.

By: elizabeth w

elizabeth w — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:38:08 +0000

what pack of lies,i know the real dna. SHE AND HER FAMILY HAVE NONE WHAT SO EVER.SUCH PRESS BULL CRAP. TO EXPLAIN AWAY PROBLEMS OF NOTT FACING THE FACT THE QUEEN GAVE A KNOD NO TO MARRIAGE FOR WILLIAM AND KATE.THAT THE BIG BREAK.ANOTHER camilla gate CASE OF SOMEONE TRYING TO BUY A HISTORY FOR KATE. BECAUSE THE REAL PERSON WHO IS CONNECTED TO THE HERITAGE THAT KATE IS SUPPOSED TO BE CONNECTED TO .WHAT bull of lies

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:27:37 +0000

Yes, Kate is not special for finding royal roots. All of us have them, however distant or from whatever country.

By: Claudius

Claudius — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:37:55 +0000

Believe it or not, we all can trace our roots from royal families around the world. This doesn’t surprise me that Kate have royal roots. We all seem to have a link somewhere to a royal. You just have to trace back and do it right.