<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Prince William celebrates 26th Birthday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>let them speak up on their own. we&#039;ll soon find out whats the real score about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let them speak up on their own. we&#8217;ll soon find out whats the real score about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7833</guid>
		<description>You seem to get my pov deeper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to get my pov deeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alsgal</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7832</link>
		<dc:creator>alsgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7832</guid>
		<description>I think you all make valid and very wise points -- I agree that I don&#039;t believe the breakup was as it seems. I do believe the &quot;establishment&quot; may very well have an agenda of sorts, although I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s necessarily a bad one as they&#039;ve managed to keep the RF going for 1000+ years, which in itself is quite remarkable -- at least to this ardent Royalist! :)

I tend to wonder if William wasn&#039;t putting Catherine through some sort of loyalty test during the April 2007 breakup? This is a young man who has been let down and betrayed by so many people --- perhaps he wanted to see for himself that Catherine was &quot;the real deal.&quot;

I think you&#039;ll all agree, she passed with flying colours and most definitely is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you all make valid and very wise points &#8212; I agree that I don&#8217;t believe the breakup was as it seems. I do believe the &#8220;establishment&#8221; may very well have an agenda of sorts, although I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s necessarily a bad one as they&#8217;ve managed to keep the RF going for 1000+ years, which in itself is quite remarkable &#8212; at least to this ardent Royalist! <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I tend to wonder if William wasn&#8217;t putting Catherine through some sort of loyalty test during the April 2007 breakup? This is a young man who has been let down and betrayed by so many people &#8212; perhaps he wanted to see for himself that Catherine was &#8220;the real deal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ll all agree, she passed with flying colours and most definitely is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ked</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator>ked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7831</guid>
		<description>lisa,

I think the break up was genuine but I have always thought that it was KM who did the breaking up.

I think she was prepared to accept PW wandering eye but not the childish and constant one night stands he appeared to be having.

I think the straw that broke the back was the girl who was escorted from his  barracks at 4am after a drunken night out with the boys.

I think that broke her heart and it was clear she was badly hurt by that and the subsequent attacks on her famiily.

PW did get her back and the famous  phone call in the car park was not PW breaking it off but the start of his comback trail.     

I think it took him longer than he thought and it was many months before they were really a couple again and I don&#039;t think the Seychelles holiday was the success the papers claimed it to be.

My own view is that it was only in the early months of 2008 that they became really close again.  Obviously I could be wrong because we don&#039;t really know what is truth and what is smoke screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lisa,</p>
<p>I think the break up was genuine but I have always thought that it was KM who did the breaking up.</p>
<p>I think she was prepared to accept PW wandering eye but not the childish and constant one night stands he appeared to be having.</p>
<p>I think the straw that broke the back was the girl who was escorted from his  barracks at 4am after a drunken night out with the boys.</p>
<p>I think that broke her heart and it was clear she was badly hurt by that and the subsequent attacks on her famiily.</p>
<p>PW did get her back and the famous  phone call in the car park was not PW breaking it off but the start of his comback trail.     </p>
<p>I think it took him longer than he thought and it was many months before they were really a couple again and I don&#8217;t think the Seychelles holiday was the success the papers claimed it to be.</p>
<p>My own view is that it was only in the early months of 2008 that they became really close again.  Obviously I could be wrong because we don&#8217;t really know what is truth and what is smoke screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7830</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7830</guid>
		<description>Most likely as proved in Monarchy history, &quot;some&quot; courtiers have their &quot;own&quot; agendum. After that is the word &quot;female&quot;, someone (s) close to the particular courtier(s).  After all history has proved that the courtier (s) (whom are blood related to the British aristocrats) whom have won in their agendum have just one objective, marry to the monarchy (Windsor family)...some female&#039;s have been and their family the collateral damage.  At this stage (21st century) and the high communicational technology that prevails, where the world may have information live with 1-3 seconds delay, and after the last happenings that caused effect  (affected)...no more discussion, everyone knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely as proved in Monarchy history, &#8220;some&#8221; courtiers have their &#8220;own&#8221; agendum. After that is the word &#8220;female&#8221;, someone (s) close to the particular courtier(s).  After all history has proved that the courtier (s) (whom are blood related to the British aristocrats) whom have won in their agendum have just one objective, marry to the monarchy (Windsor family)&#8230;some female&#8217;s have been and their family the collateral damage.  At this stage (21st century) and the high communicational technology that prevails, where the world may have information live with 1-3 seconds delay, and after the last happenings that caused effect  (affected)&#8230;no more discussion, everyone knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>ked, I have to confess that I am one of those people who does not exactly believe the &quot;breakup&quot; was what it seemed. I also firmly(pardon the pun) believe that PW has more power and influence then any of the whiners who may be threatened by the possibility of a strong willed, intelligent woman coming onboard in the near future. They will,afterall, answer to her. :) I think things will work out just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ked, I have to confess that I am one of those people who does not exactly believe the &#8220;breakup&#8221; was what it seemed. I also firmly(pardon the pun) believe that PW has more power and influence then any of the whiners who may be threatened by the possibility of a strong willed, intelligent woman coming onboard in the near future. They will,afterall, answer to her. <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think things will work out just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ked</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7828</link>
		<dc:creator>ked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7828</guid>
		<description>Me,

Someone once mentioned on here that the monarchy has existed for 1,000+ years and except for the last 50 or so years arranged marriages were the accepted way of establishing and continuing a royal line.

In recent years there has been the advent of &#039;love&#039; marriages which have not always worked.

So perhaps, and this is supposition only, those we have labelled &#039;the establishment&#039; whose main occupation is to protect and continue the monarchy, may think that the way ahead in troubled times is to revert to the established system of an arranged marriage.

The lovers PW/KM may be considered by &#039;them&#039; as a threat to their project so ways and means should be found to rock their boat.  This may or may not be supported by others.

Think 18 months ago.  KM was very popular and no one had thought of saying cruel things about her.    

They broke up.  KM continued to be popular but PW&#039;s popularity dropped like a stone.

They made up, one way or another, but suddenly the nasty remarks on KM started. How or why they started would be hard to find, but at the same time efforts were made to push PW popularity.

He bacame action man with lots of publicity and his popularity recovered.   How was this managed ? Who managed it ? What was the agenda ?

Lots of questions but difficult answers and that is why I ask you not to count chickens.  Instead just pray and hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me,</p>
<p>Someone once mentioned on here that the monarchy has existed for 1,000+ years and except for the last 50 or so years arranged marriages were the accepted way of establishing and continuing a royal line.</p>
<p>In recent years there has been the advent of &#8216;love&#8217; marriages which have not always worked.</p>
<p>So perhaps, and this is supposition only, those we have labelled &#8216;the establishment&#8217; whose main occupation is to protect and continue the monarchy, may think that the way ahead in troubled times is to revert to the established system of an arranged marriage.</p>
<p>The lovers PW/KM may be considered by &#8216;them&#8217; as a threat to their project so ways and means should be found to rock their boat.  This may or may not be supported by others.</p>
<p>Think 18 months ago.  KM was very popular and no one had thought of saying cruel things about her.    </p>
<p>They broke up.  KM continued to be popular but PW&#8217;s popularity dropped like a stone.</p>
<p>They made up, one way or another, but suddenly the nasty remarks on KM started. How or why they started would be hard to find, but at the same time efforts were made to push PW popularity.</p>
<p>He bacame action man with lots of publicity and his popularity recovered.   How was this managed ? Who managed it ? What was the agenda ?</p>
<p>Lots of questions but difficult answers and that is why I ask you not to count chickens.  Instead just pray and hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7827</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7827</guid>
		<description>Me, you are right on. I am quite sure all systems are  *go*!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, you are right on. I am quite sure all systems are  *go*!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7826</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7826</guid>
		<description>One thing is sure, she would have been a bygone a long long long time ago, if any &quot;issue&quot; was detected, detected issues in the BRF are FASTER then lightning. zzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is sure, she would have been a bygone a long long long time ago, if any &#8220;issue&#8221; was detected, detected issues in the BRF are FASTER then lightning. zzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/06/21/video-prince-william-celebrates-26th-birthday/#comment-7825</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1224#comment-7825</guid>
		<description>The BRF have a wide experience in the making of a Collateral Damage, as well as a wide experience in receiving the backfire,  Action/Reaction if you know what I mean.  

I have a strong feeling that arranged marriages - collateral damage - aren&#039;t in the cards of the Monarchy 21st century.  Although - keeping to some practices - she will or already has gone for a full medical examination - If you know what I mean again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BRF have a wide experience in the making of a Collateral Damage, as well as a wide experience in receiving the backfire,  Action/Reaction if you know what I mean.  </p>
<p>I have a strong feeling that arranged marriages &#8211; collateral damage &#8211; aren&#8217;t in the cards of the Monarchy 21st century.  Although &#8211; keeping to some practices &#8211; she will or already has gone for a full medical examination &#8211; If you know what I mean again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.345 seconds -->
