Comments on: Mail on Sunday’s Editor: Paparazzi and The Royals http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/07/15/mail-on-sundays-editor-paparazzi-and-the-royals/ All the latest royal relationship news and gossip Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:45:18 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: BRW http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/07/15/mail-on-sundays-editor-paparazzi-and-the-royals/comment-page-1/#comment-8612 BRW Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:05:17 +0000 http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1279#comment-8612 "I think there is a strong case that photographers following somebody all day every day whatever they are doing is not right." I notice that the editor hasn't actually let his opinion get in the way of publishing paparazzi shots. In the past the Daily Mail has published plenty of photos where photos have 'stalked' their targets. It doesn't matter whether they've been taken by the paper's photographers or photo agencies - it's the fact that he's publishing them. A tad hypocritical me thinks... “I think there is a strong case that photographers following somebody all day every day whatever they are doing is not right.”

I notice that the editor hasn’t actually let his opinion get in the way of publishing paparazzi shots.

In the past the Daily Mail has published plenty of photos where photos have ’stalked’ their targets.

It doesn’t matter whether they’ve been taken by the paper’s photographers or photo agencies – it’s the fact that he’s publishing them.

A tad hypocritical me thinks…

]]> By: bluefire http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/07/15/mail-on-sundays-editor-paparazzi-and-the-royals/comment-page-1/#comment-8609 bluefire Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:26:37 +0000 http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1279#comment-8609 whatever moves of the royalties, paparazzi reacts. the camera is zoom in, zoom out! they're always there. whatever moves of the royalties, paparazzi reacts. the camera is zoom in, zoom out! they’re always there.

]]> By: Me http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/07/15/mail-on-sundays-editor-paparazzi-and-the-royals/comment-page-1/#comment-8559 Me Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:43:41 +0000 http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1279#comment-8559 or getting into a cab and the paparazzi really have to kneel down, go upside down, lean over the cab, stick the camara up her and zoom in or getting into a cab and the paparazzi really have to kneel down, go upside down, lean over the cab, stick the camara up her and zoom in

]]> By: alsgal http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/07/15/mail-on-sundays-editor-paparazzi-and-the-royals/comment-page-1/#comment-8557 alsgal Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:37:28 +0000 http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1279#comment-8557 Pity it is so difficult to find the Mail over here -- would have so enjoyed reading up on Mr. Barry Manilow, in addition to the article about the Royals and the paparazzi. JMO, but I say let them have their pictures of the Royals coming out of a public place such a Boujis but is it really necessary to see Catherine inside of Starbucks ordering her white chocolate mocha? I think not! Nor do I find it necessary to see pictures of the poor thing inhaling car exhaust as she peddles her way to work -- way too intrusive if you ask me! Pity it is so difficult to find the Mail over here — would have so enjoyed reading up on Mr. Barry Manilow, in addition to the article about the Royals and the paparazzi.
JMO, but I say let them have their pictures of the Royals coming out of a public place such a Boujis but is it really necessary to see Catherine inside of Starbucks ordering her white chocolate mocha? I think not! Nor do I find it necessary to see pictures of the poor thing inhaling car exhaust as she peddles her way to work — way too intrusive if you ask me!

]]>