<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal News Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:24:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13966</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13966</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1078595/Beatrice-bunny-girl-Pictures-princess-partying-Thailand-gap-year.html

UPDATE ON PRINCESS BEATRICE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1078595/Beatrice-bunny-girl-Pictures-princess-partying-Thailand-gap-year.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1078595/Beatrice-bunny-girl-Pictures-princess-partying-Thailand-gap-year.html</a></p>
<p>UPDATE ON PRINCESS BEATRICE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13551</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13551</guid>
		<description>probably you are right trixie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably you are right trixie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trixie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13547</link>
		<dc:creator>Trixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13547</guid>
		<description>:-D sonia, you are very naive when it comes to the media. They can NEVER have enough information on anyone. Did it help Diana that she gave a very personal interview? Did the press leave her alone? Does the press leave Bad Pitt and Angelina Jolie alone because they provide all those family pics for millions of dollars? No. The game doesn&#039;t work like that. The press doesn&#039;t want the &quot;official&quot; gossip, i.e. what you say and do in public - they want what&#039;s hidden and exclusive to their paper. They will always speculate and digg for dirt - no matter how many interviews and photo op you give. To the contrary the more you open up about your personal life - the less standing you&#039;ll have to tell the press &quot;no&quot; at any point. Some already denie Kate the right of privacy because she dares smile when pictured. Now imagine what they would do would she start talking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  sonia, you are very naive when it comes to the media. They can NEVER have enough information on anyone. Did it help Diana that she gave a very personal interview? Did the press leave her alone? Does the press leave Bad Pitt and Angelina Jolie alone because they provide all those family pics for millions of dollars? No. The game doesn&#8217;t work like that. The press doesn&#8217;t want the &#8220;official&#8221; gossip, i.e. what you say and do in public &#8211; they want what&#8217;s hidden and exclusive to their paper. They will always speculate and digg for dirt &#8211; no matter how many interviews and photo op you give. To the contrary the more you open up about your personal life &#8211; the less standing you&#8217;ll have to tell the press &#8220;no&#8221; at any point. Some already denie Kate the right of privacy because she dares smile when pictured. Now imagine what they would do would she start talking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13546</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13546</guid>
		<description>Rman,
when people dont know what is going on with other people, the only thing they can do is speculate.  Probably if PW was a little bit more open with the media, people would stop speculating and they would also stop making up false statements about them.  The more PW and KM hide, the more the media is going to follow them. Probably, if they gave the media what they want, an interview, etc.. then the media would stop following them because they already obtained from them what they wanted to obtain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rman,<br />
when people dont know what is going on with other people, the only thing they can do is speculate.  Probably if PW was a little bit more open with the media, people would stop speculating and they would also stop making up false statements about them.  The more PW and KM hide, the more the media is going to follow them. Probably, if they gave the media what they want, an interview, etc.. then the media would stop following them because they already obtained from them what they wanted to obtain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13545</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13545</guid>
		<description>KM should have done what she is doing now(showing the people that she has a proper job) way long time ago.  I believe that at first, she was so certain that she was going to get a proposal from PW that she didnt consider it necessary for her to have a proper job probably thinking that she wasnt going to need it.  But now that she realizes that this is damaging her reputation and that PW is running away from her (by going to the army), she tries to show the people that she has gotten a job with her parents so that she will repair her reputation and so that PW will get back to her.  But I believe that this is a little bit too late for her.  She should&#039;ve done this from the day she graduated from st. andrews university.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KM should have done what she is doing now(showing the people that she has a proper job) way long time ago.  I believe that at first, she was so certain that she was going to get a proposal from PW that she didnt consider it necessary for her to have a proper job probably thinking that she wasnt going to need it.  But now that she realizes that this is damaging her reputation and that PW is running away from her (by going to the army), she tries to show the people that she has gotten a job with her parents so that she will repair her reputation and so that PW will get back to her.  But I believe that this is a little bit too late for her.  She should&#8217;ve done this from the day she graduated from st. andrews university.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13530</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13530</guid>
		<description>mapleleaf you are quite correct. There are always going to be the odd challenged poster on which ever website you are on.  I think you are quite right just ignore the challenged posters and respond to the individuals who post sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mapleleaf you are quite correct. There are always going to be the odd challenged poster on which ever website you are on.  I think you are quite right just ignore the challenged posters and respond to the individuals who post sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apryl</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13528</link>
		<dc:creator>Apryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13528</guid>
		<description>But isn&#039;t that what everyone&#039;s doing?  Speculating when they don&#039;t know William or Kate personally?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t that what everyone&#8217;s doing?  Speculating when they don&#8217;t know William or Kate personally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapleleaf</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13527</link>
		<dc:creator>mapleleaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13527</guid>
		<description>Guys,

It&#039;s obvious joiedevivre either has personal issues with his/her mental stability, or this person just has a pathetic need to stir the *** pot and run away.  

It&#039;s called &quot;trolling and flaming&quot;, and IMO it should be totally ignored because it adds no value to our conversation.  I also think Vicki R. is just copying joiedevivre&#039;s actions.

I really wish that people who behave like that, people who don&#039;t want to add any actual value to the conversation, would just.......
KEEP QUIET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious joiedevivre either has personal issues with his/her mental stability, or this person just has a pathetic need to stir the *** pot and run away.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s called &#8220;trolling and flaming&#8221;, and IMO it should be totally ignored because it adds no value to our conversation.  I also think Vicki R. is just copying joiedevivre&#8217;s actions.</p>
<p>I really wish that people who behave like that, people who don&#8217;t want to add any actual value to the conversation, would just&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
KEEP QUIET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13526</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very tierd of the silly speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very tierd of the silly speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gracie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/10/13/royal-news-links-138/comment-page-1/#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>gracie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1783#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very odd thing to post! We all speculate here, but that&#039;s going a little to far. Has this blogger ever made comments on here before, cause the name does not look familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very odd thing to post! We all speculate here, but that&#8217;s going a little to far. Has this blogger ever made comments on here before, cause the name does not look familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.332 seconds -->
