<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal News Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:46:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mariskaaugsta</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-16822</link>
		<dc:creator>mariskaaugsta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-16822</guid>
		<description>a little baby for wills and catherine? ha. ha. that is too funny. me am so jelous of catherine. ha. ha. one day me will get her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a little baby for wills and catherine? ha. ha. that is too funny. me am so jelous of catherine. ha. ha. one day me will get her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: candoruk</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15527</link>
		<dc:creator>candoruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15527</guid>
		<description>I know Richard Kay was talking about a previous girlfriend, but I still wonder if he was foreshadowing something about to come out about his current Kate,becoming an Ex.

I honestly don&#039;t think they are together anymore in a serious manner. Maybe something will come out after Charles Birthday celebrations.
Kate is not written up in the press anymore in a positive manner as if she will become his bride. I do feel people are questioning her status.

Since the RAF announcement, it seems Kate 
sightings with William have been somewhat been sparse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Richard Kay was talking about a previous girlfriend, but I still wonder if he was foreshadowing something about to come out about his current Kate,becoming an Ex.</p>
<p>I honestly don&#8217;t think they are together anymore in a serious manner. Maybe something will come out after Charles Birthday celebrations.<br />
Kate is not written up in the press anymore in a positive manner as if she will become his bride. I do feel people are questioning her status.</p>
<p>Since the RAF announcement, it seems Kate<br />
sightings with William have been somewhat been sparse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15526</guid>
		<description>candoruk, Richard Kay was talking about a girlfriend of William&#039;s that he dated before Kate. The Buckingham palace party was for Charles friends and family like other royals. Kate &amp; Chelsy was not invited to that party only Highgrove&#039;s party this Sat. Why everytime Kate &amp; William is not seen together in awhile, people think they aren&#039;t together? That&#039;s nuts. There is no evidence whatsoever that they have split. Kate is busy and have been for some time now. It&#039;s good that she has faithfully layed low for awhile to get rid of the negitive press. They have nothing to write about now so I guess that mission is accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>candoruk, Richard Kay was talking about a girlfriend of William&#8217;s that he dated before Kate. The Buckingham palace party was for Charles friends and family like other royals. Kate &amp; Chelsy was not invited to that party only Highgrove&#8217;s party this Sat. Why everytime Kate &amp; William is not seen together in awhile, people think they aren&#8217;t together? That&#8217;s nuts. There is no evidence whatsoever that they have split. Kate is busy and have been for some time now. It&#8217;s good that she has faithfully layed low for awhile to get rid of the negitive press. They have nothing to write about now so I guess that mission is accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: candoruk</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15525</link>
		<dc:creator>candoruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15525</guid>
		<description>The problem for Kate is the press seems to have taken the gloves off of promoting her as Princess material, the way they promoted her a few years ago. They write her up in a negative way as if she is no longer a possible bride choice. She certainly hasn&#039;t had much in the way of good headlines the past six months.

The Branson photo was a few years old, not current at all, it was addressed on the site.
It was a few years ago when Kate attended Holly Branson&#039;s birthday party.

Kate hasn&#039;t been seen out in weeks in photos.

Could the relationship have ended?
Richard Kay seemed to be hinting with his past headline about William&#039;s former ex, the headline read as if it could have been Kate.
I honestly don&#039;t believe William and Kate are together anymore, despite the ballyhooed, supposed recent headlines about him going off hunting with friends. Everything seems quite off with them these days.
No photos of Kate lately with William and she did not attend the party as was previously written, so have they cooled.
Can he go through another Xmas season and New Year without a proposal to her? 
Perhaps it has ended. Maybe after Charles party a story will come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for Kate is the press seems to have taken the gloves off of promoting her as Princess material, the way they promoted her a few years ago. They write her up in a negative way as if she is no longer a possible bride choice. She certainly hasn&#8217;t had much in the way of good headlines the past six months.</p>
<p>The Branson photo was a few years old, not current at all, it was addressed on the site.<br />
It was a few years ago when Kate attended Holly Branson&#8217;s birthday party.</p>
<p>Kate hasn&#8217;t been seen out in weeks in photos.</p>
<p>Could the relationship have ended?<br />
Richard Kay seemed to be hinting with his past headline about William&#8217;s former ex, the headline read as if it could have been Kate.<br />
I honestly don&#8217;t believe William and Kate are together anymore, despite the ballyhooed, supposed recent headlines about him going off hunting with friends. Everything seems quite off with them these days.<br />
No photos of Kate lately with William and she did not attend the party as was previously written, so have they cooled.<br />
Can he go through another Xmas season and New Year without a proposal to her?<br />
Perhaps it has ended. Maybe after Charles party a story will come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leogirl</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15340</link>
		<dc:creator>leogirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15340</guid>
		<description>This is really mean. &quot;Out of character&quot;?! Even if Kate did get pregnant, it doesn&#039;t necessarily mean she was irresponsible. Every time you have ***, even if you use protection, there is a chance the girl/woman will get pregnant. The Pill is 0.3% failure rate for perfect use, or 8% typical use. Condoms are slightly higher (I believe it&#039;s 2% and 10-15%).

There was a married couple, they had four kids and didn&#039;t want anymore. They used the Pill, a condom, and spermicide and the wife still managed to get pregnant with child #5.

The only failure-proof birth control is abstinence. You can&#039;t be in a society that encourages premarital sexual activity and be upset when a woman turns up pregnant out-of-wedlock. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really mean. &#8220;Out of character&#8221;?! Even if Kate did get pregnant, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean she was irresponsible. Every time you have ***, even if you use protection, there is a chance the girl/woman will get pregnant. The Pill is 0.3% failure rate for perfect use, or 8% typical use. Condoms are slightly higher (I believe it&#8217;s 2% and 10-15%).</p>
<p>There was a married couple, they had four kids and didn&#8217;t want anymore. They used the Pill, a condom, and spermicide and the wife still managed to get pregnant with child #5.</p>
<p>The only failure-proof birth control is abstinence. You can&#8217;t be in a society that encourages premarital sexual activity and be upset when a woman turns up pregnant out-of-wedlock. <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRW</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>BRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>Phantom pregnancies make stars shine - Sydney Morning Herald

&quot;On the whole, headlines on gossip magazine covers are a load of tripe. Savvy readers of the weekly tattle rags are deeply aware of this and their enjoyment is not sullied by front pages, stories and column titbits that have nothing to do with facts. That&#039;s if there are any facts to report...&quot;

http://www.smh.com.au/news/lifeandstyle/people/phantom-pregnancies-make-stars-shine/2008/11/10/1226318596245.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phantom pregnancies make stars shine &#8211; Sydney Morning Herald</p>
<p>&#8220;On the whole, headlines on gossip magazine covers are a load of tripe. Savvy readers of the weekly tattle rags are deeply aware of this and their enjoyment is not sullied by front pages, stories and column titbits that have nothing to do with facts. That&#8217;s if there are any facts to report&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/lifeandstyle/people/phantom-pregnancies-make-stars-shine/2008/11/10/1226318596245.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/lifeandstyle/people/phantom-pregnancies-make-stars-shine/2008/11/10/1226318596245.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>how true is the pregnancy of kate? i think its a negative and damaging article that i have been encounter. i thinked if this is true , wills should marry as soon as possible;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how true is the pregnancy of kate? i think its a negative and damaging article that i have been encounter. i thinked if this is true , wills should marry as soon as possible;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15280</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15280</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s okay Sonia, that just what I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s okay Sonia, that just what I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15279</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15279</guid>
		<description>Rman
sorry to contradict you this time, but the RF has not all the time brought good things to britain.  Lets remember that the RFs from the past burned, hung, decapitated innocent people (example Henry VIII).  In today&#039;s day, RFs dont do that anymore because they are now more regulated by the people (by the prime minister).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rman<br />
sorry to contradict you this time, but the RF has not all the time brought good things to britain.  Lets remember that the RFs from the past burned, hung, decapitated innocent people (example Henry VIII).  In today&#8217;s day, RFs dont do that anymore because they are now more regulated by the people (by the prime minister).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/10/royal-news-links-154/comment-page-2/#comment-15277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=1950#comment-15277</guid>
		<description>Well diana, that is the way you feel and I respect that. Although I&#039;m still jumping up and down that Obama is our new President, I still wish our First Families would learn something from The Royal Family. I personaly think Britain is a geat country and very lucky to have a family like The Monarchy who truly represents that country and the Commonwealth with so much heart and dedication. Decade after decade The Windsor&#039;s has worked constintly to bring the communities together and they raise their children to the same. Britain is very lucky to have that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well diana, that is the way you feel and I respect that. Although I&#8217;m still jumping up and down that Obama is our new President, I still wish our First Families would learn something from The Royal Family. I personaly think Britain is a geat country and very lucky to have a family like The Monarchy who truly represents that country and the Commonwealth with so much heart and dedication. Decade after decade The Windsor&#8217;s has worked constintly to bring the communities together and they raise their children to the same. Britain is very lucky to have that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.341 seconds -->
