<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal News Links &#8211; Bumper Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16739</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16739</guid>
		<description>i thinked PW and KM cover stories on the mag. will be sold in the stalls and it will be outof stack, because of many people dig about their relationship and wat happened to their lives. especially PW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thinked PW and KM cover stories on the mag. will be sold in the stalls and it will be outof stack, because of many people dig about their relationship and wat happened to their lives. especially PW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trixie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16738</link>
		<dc:creator>Trixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16738</guid>
		<description>sonia, of course there will be an announcement - that of an engagement. Diana wasn&#039;t recognised as mere girlfriend she was introduced as fiance. However BEFORE they are engaged no announcement will be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonia, of course there will be an announcement &#8211; that of an engagement. Diana wasn&#8217;t recognised as mere girlfriend she was introduced as fiance. However BEFORE they are engaged no announcement will be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16737</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16737</guid>
		<description>anastasia, 
I posted my comment without reading your comment first. I see that both of us agree on the possibility of being invited to royal events as a friend.
I swear, I didnt read your comment before posting mine.  Dont think I plagiarized your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anastasia,<br />
I posted my comment without reading your comment first. I see that both of us agree on the possibility of being invited to royal events as a friend.<br />
I swear, I didnt read your comment before posting mine.  Dont think I plagiarized your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16736</link>
		<dc:creator>sonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16736</guid>
		<description>Trixie,
The KM/PW is way too different from the sophie, camilla, and autumn case.  PW will be king, and KM may be queen as well if she marries william.  So there has to be an official announcement as there was one for lady diana and PC (the future king of england).
Although everyone knows that KM is dating PW, there has to be an acknowledgment from the RF.  I do believe that PW and KM have been more than friends (they&#039;ve dating) all these years, but if the RF does not acknowledge this relationship, then this relationship may not be as  serious even though KM/PW are taking it seriously.  Lets remember that PW cant just do what he wants, he has to follow the royal family rules, and even though the Royal family doesnt seem to be opposing to this relationship ( KM has been invited to many events) there hasnt been an official acknowledgment from the RF. This might be probably because for the RF KM may just be a friend or companion even though for william KM means more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trixie,<br />
The KM/PW is way too different from the sophie, camilla, and autumn case.  PW will be king, and KM may be queen as well if she marries william.  So there has to be an official announcement as there was one for lady diana and PC (the future king of england).<br />
Although everyone knows that KM is dating PW, there has to be an acknowledgment from the RF.  I do believe that PW and KM have been more than friends (they&#8217;ve dating) all these years, but if the RF does not acknowledge this relationship, then this relationship may not be as  serious even though KM/PW are taking it seriously.  Lets remember that PW cant just do what he wants, he has to follow the royal family rules, and even though the Royal family doesnt seem to be opposing to this relationship ( KM has been invited to many events) there hasnt been an official acknowledgment from the RF. This might be probably because for the RF KM may just be a friend or companion even though for william KM means more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16735</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16735</guid>
		<description>But you know, Kate is his girlfriend and his friend. That is what make them so special and what has brung them this far, is the friendship in their relationship. I have always believed that a couple married or not have to be friends. Now if anyone think that they are just friends and not boyfriend &amp; girlfriend is totally out of their mind because we know that&#039;s not true. It&#039;s so different to carry out a royal relationship in this day and age. And in William&#039;s position in the royal family, people have this image of what his future Princess &amp; Queen will have to be but we are now in a modern world and he has a modern woman. I sometimes read other royal blogs and I think a lot of bloggers have to realize that William is in love with the girl, he may not hold her hand in public and kiss her so all the paps can see how much he loves her but that doesn&#039;t take away how he really feels about her. I have no doubt in my mind that when they get into the privacy of their own homes, things are much more different. We have to give them time and they will let us know what will happen next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you know, Kate is his girlfriend and his friend. That is what make them so special and what has brung them this far, is the friendship in their relationship. I have always believed that a couple married or not have to be friends. Now if anyone think that they are just friends and not boyfriend &amp; girlfriend is totally out of their mind because we know that&#8217;s not true. It&#8217;s so different to carry out a royal relationship in this day and age. And in William&#8217;s position in the royal family, people have this image of what his future Princess &amp; Queen will have to be but we are now in a modern world and he has a modern woman. I sometimes read other royal blogs and I think a lot of bloggers have to realize that William is in love with the girl, he may not hold her hand in public and kiss her so all the paps can see how much he loves her but that doesn&#8217;t take away how he really feels about her. I have no doubt in my mind that when they get into the privacy of their own homes, things are much more different. We have to give them time and they will let us know what will happen next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trixie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16734</link>
		<dc:creator>Trixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16734</guid>
		<description>Just to clarifie. Has the BRF EVER &quot;acknowledged&quot; a partner of any member prior to an engagement? Was there ever a public announcement about Sophie or Camilla, Autumn, Fergie, Diana, Chelsy, Mike? I don&#039;t think so. There were the &quot;Camilla is non negotiable&quot; articles but that wasn&#039;t a public official announcement.
To expect William to be the exception and shout out loud &quot;This is my girlfriend&quot; when everyone knows it anyways, is rather absurd. Noone would fall for the &quot;they were just friends&quot; line anyways - yeah &quot;friends&quot; for 5 years, living together, holidaying together, attending high profile events exclusively with her and then she was such a great &quot;friend&quot; that she was even invited to family weddings William didn&#039;t even attend himself - if they put that one out they may as well publicly announce William is gay because that would be the only way this claim was half way believeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarifie. Has the BRF EVER &#8220;acknowledged&#8221; a partner of any member prior to an engagement? Was there ever a public announcement about Sophie or Camilla, Autumn, Fergie, Diana, Chelsy, Mike? I don&#8217;t think so. There were the &#8220;Camilla is non negotiable&#8221; articles but that wasn&#8217;t a public official announcement.<br />
To expect William to be the exception and shout out loud &#8220;This is my girlfriend&#8221; when everyone knows it anyways, is rather absurd. Noone would fall for the &#8220;they were just friends&#8221; line anyways &#8211; yeah &#8220;friends&#8221; for 5 years, living together, holidaying together, attending high profile events exclusively with her and then she was such a great &#8220;friend&#8221; that she was even invited to family weddings William didn&#8217;t even attend himself &#8211; if they put that one out they may as well publicly announce William is gay because that would be the only way this claim was half way believeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anastasia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16733</link>
		<dc:creator>anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16733</guid>
		<description>ps:

Trixie, someone should send Chelsey a copy of The Rules fast!  She travels to london b/c ph is too whatever to go see her in leeds?!   that is astonishing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps:</p>
<p>Trixie, someone should send Chelsey a copy of The Rules fast!  She travels to london b/c ph is too whatever to go see her in leeds?!   that is astonishing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anastasia</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16732</link>
		<dc:creator>anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16732</guid>
		<description>hi all,

Rman, that ceremony sounds fascinating! 

Alsgal, some of the visual images that your posts invoke are hilarious!

:)

otherwise, in defense of ked,  i think ked has more inside info than most of us posting on here; so, even at those times when things appear to be going well for km and pw, such as when they were in the seychelles,  ked provided info that, even then, appearances may have been deceptive; that was just one example of how things weren&#039;t good even when they superficially appeared good.

otherwise,as Ked is suggesting, it probably does help to sometimes see things from a more historical or structural perspective; the monarchy has its own inherent organizational logic and this imposes constraints on its various members; 

but, on the other hand, each member of the monarchy has some free will and autonomy, and can use this to make decisions, even those decisions that go against the preservation of the monarchy as an institution.

my history is weak here, but weren&#039;t there some notorious cases in British history?  of members of the royal family who rebelled and went against the grain and rejected the monarchical dicates and instead pursued their own interests?  of course to act autonomously requires a certain strength of character or determination or whatever, and it&#039;s not clear pw has that.

otherwise, Rman seems to be arguing that even though the RF never officially or formally acknowledged km&#039;s status as pw&#039;s girlfriend, the mere fact km was invited to certain functions was tantamount to official annoucement and recognition of her formal status.

but, that&#039;s where i tend to agree more with ked; of course everyone would say that, on the face of it, km is pw&#039;s official and formally acknowledged girlfriend, since she was invited to such ceremonies, such as the royal garter ceremony.  But that&#039;s where the RF is so sly and tricky.  

KM gets invited, and even she thinks this is highly significant; but, in the absence of the formal verbal acknowledgement that she has a real romantic relt&#039;p with pw, things are still very ambiguous.  yes, she was invited, but if pressed, the RF can insist she was invited only in the capacity of good friend.  

They are all carefully and deliberately creating and nurturing that ambiguity.  It serves their interests well.  They can use that to defend pw if public opinion turns against his callow treatment of km, by insisting that everyone knew all along that km was just a good friend and no one *ever* said anything differently.  It&#039;s all rather ghastly but it&#039;s the monarchy&#039;s way of protecting itself and pw appears willing to cave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi all,</p>
<p>Rman, that ceremony sounds fascinating! </p>
<p>Alsgal, some of the visual images that your posts invoke are hilarious!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>otherwise, in defense of ked,  i think ked has more inside info than most of us posting on here; so, even at those times when things appear to be going well for km and pw, such as when they were in the seychelles,  ked provided info that, even then, appearances may have been deceptive; that was just one example of how things weren&#8217;t good even when they superficially appeared good.</p>
<p>otherwise,as Ked is suggesting, it probably does help to sometimes see things from a more historical or structural perspective; the monarchy has its own inherent organizational logic and this imposes constraints on its various members; </p>
<p>but, on the other hand, each member of the monarchy has some free will and autonomy, and can use this to make decisions, even those decisions that go against the preservation of the monarchy as an institution.</p>
<p>my history is weak here, but weren&#8217;t there some notorious cases in British history?  of members of the royal family who rebelled and went against the grain and rejected the monarchical dicates and instead pursued their own interests?  of course to act autonomously requires a certain strength of character or determination or whatever, and it&#8217;s not clear pw has that.</p>
<p>otherwise, Rman seems to be arguing that even though the RF never officially or formally acknowledged km&#8217;s status as pw&#8217;s girlfriend, the mere fact km was invited to certain functions was tantamount to official annoucement and recognition of her formal status.</p>
<p>but, that&#8217;s where i tend to agree more with ked; of course everyone would say that, on the face of it, km is pw&#8217;s official and formally acknowledged girlfriend, since she was invited to such ceremonies, such as the royal garter ceremony.  But that&#8217;s where the RF is so sly and tricky.  </p>
<p>KM gets invited, and even she thinks this is highly significant; but, in the absence of the formal verbal acknowledgement that she has a real romantic relt&#8217;p with pw, things are still very ambiguous.  yes, she was invited, but if pressed, the RF can insist she was invited only in the capacity of good friend.  </p>
<p>They are all carefully and deliberately creating and nurturing that ambiguity.  It serves their interests well.  They can use that to defend pw if public opinion turns against his callow treatment of km, by insisting that everyone knew all along that km was just a good friend and no one *ever* said anything differently.  It&#8217;s all rather ghastly but it&#8217;s the monarchy&#8217;s way of protecting itself and pw appears willing to cave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trixie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16731</link>
		<dc:creator>Trixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16731</guid>
		<description>Good point Rman. The decommission of Brittannia was in December 1997. If my memory serves me right Sophie was pictured with HM and the rest of the royal family on the yacht at the occassion. The engagement between Edward and her however was not announced until January 1999 with the wedding in June.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Rman. The decommission of Brittannia was in December 1997. If my memory serves me right Sophie was pictured with HM and the rest of the royal family on the yacht at the occassion. The engagement between Edward and her however was not announced until January 1999 with the wedding in June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alsgal AKA Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2008/11/29/royal-news-links-bumper-edition-2/comment-page-5/#comment-16730</link>
		<dc:creator>alsgal AKA Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2063#comment-16730</guid>
		<description>Obama in an ermine robe and a tiara -- now that I&#039;d like to see! :)

But it will be a very elegant Inauguration and let me tell you, if anyone is planning to visit DC on Jan. 20th -- you had better buy yourself a Winnebago to snooze in because all of the hotels are sold out. 

Alsgal thought of maybe sleeping in a port-a-potty but once you have rolled down an embankment in one of those babies, it is hard to get back up on that horse (or potty.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama in an ermine robe and a tiara &#8212; now that I&#8217;d like to see! <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But it will be a very elegant Inauguration and let me tell you, if anyone is planning to visit DC on Jan. 20th &#8212; you had better buy yourself a Winnebago to snooze in because all of the hotels are sold out. </p>
<p>Alsgal thought of maybe sleeping in a port-a-potty but once you have rolled down an embankment in one of those babies, it is hard to get back up on that horse (or potty.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.341 seconds -->
