The Royal ReportDon’t forget to check out Marilyn Braun’s always entertaining internet radio show “The Royal Report” this Sunday night at 9pm. ** Update – I’ve embedded the show below **

This weeks topic – Is a Summer Wedding imminent for Prince William and Kate Middleton?

“Rumours are swirling that Prince William and Kate Middleton will have a summer wedding. On this episode I will make my predictions. Settling, once and for all, whether they will get married this summer. Only I will reveal the truth! Prepare to be amazed!”

95 Responses to "Radio Show: Is a Wedding imminent for William & Kate?"
  • Guest #1 - March 21, 2009 at 10:08 am

    I highly doubt they are getting married this year. I highly doubt they are getting married next year. Their courtship I think is more modern in that they are taking their time, getting to know each other well, and are in no rush to marry in order to live and sleep together. And hooray for that and for them. I’m quite content to wait them out. I still think they are a great match and will make do good things for their country in years to come.

  • rosettaresearch #2 - March 21, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I am truly happy they are getting to know each other. But, I wish they would hurry up and get it over already.

  • maddie #3 - March 21, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    I think it is funny Katie nicholls says ” He says one thing and Prince William goes and does something else” DUH!!!
    http://tinyurl.com/cv8zps

  • Roseary #4 - March 21, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    I have child and clearance house has proff. You will get to see it now, it has took 3 years. 03/22/2009.

  • Roseary #5 - March 21, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    His- prince william’s. Clearance house got the proff a couple of days ago, you will see it. It took 3 years . A whole bunch of bad people remarking about mental illness shrinks stalking.

  • Clover #6 - March 21, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    WOW!

    Roseary,
    Do you claim to be the mother of PW’s child?
    Are you saying that Clarence House now has proof of paternity for your three-year old and that they are calling you a crazy, mentally unstable stalker?

    Now that one takes the cake! You win the prize for best BRW claim today!

    WOW!

    One more question. When did you say the story would break? Was that tomorrow 3/22/09?

  • Roseary #7 - March 21, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    Clover you are replying like a bad person. I need to take a break or eat a cake . Try csa uk. Prince william lives in cornwall, wales, child support say’s. London.

  • Clover #8 - March 21, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    Roseary,
    First, I am just trying to make sense of your claim. Second, I am really not trying to be a “bad” person.

    What does “csauk.” mean?
    I really don’t get what you mean by “Prince william lives in cornwall, wales, child support say’s. London” — please explain?

  • Roseary #9 - March 21, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    Csa uk is a way to get child support based usually on income, like work. London that is where (prince) william windsor will pay the child support.

  • Lisa #10 - March 21, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    It just keeps getting better and better :(

  • Clover #11 - March 21, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    Roseary,
    Thanks for answering my questions.

    Two more questions, when and how will we hear about this baby?

    Who is the mother?

  • Rman #12 - March 21, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    LOL, LOL, LOL.

  • Roseary #13 - March 21, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    Clover-The mother is beth davenport. You’ll hear of the child though clearance house because of csa uk

  • Lisa #14 - March 22, 2009 at 12:02 am

    And people wonder why these people need bodyguards? You can’t make this stuff up.

    BRW,the next time you have entertainment planned, let me know ahead of time so I can shop for snacks! ;)

  • Rman #15 - March 22, 2009 at 12:16 am

    Why in the these recent articals they are stating that William & Kate have been together for 5 years? Actually they have been together for seven years.

  • Clover #16 - March 22, 2009 at 12:16 am

    Roseary,

    I googled the name “Beth Davenport” and she was the most popular character on the1970s show called The Rockford Files.

    There is also a Beth Davenport who coaches the Women’s Olympic Cycling team.

    The first BD is much to old to have had a child recently. The second one I am not sure about, but would rule out given her training schedule.

    That is the best I could do. Can you help me find the “Beth Davenport” you speak of? Where on earth did she meet the Prince?

    Is there any reason why you continue to refer to Clarence House and Clearance House?

    Will this child support news break tomorrow?

  • Lisa #17 - March 22, 2009 at 12:20 am

    Katie Nicholl’s latest literary masterpiece is truly one of her worst. Seriously,how obvious can you get? They duped her with the fake skiing leak and she came off looking stooooooooooopid again and so she tries to get even. Dumb and oh so obvious. Geez I wonder what she did to poor Rebecca English for reporting the other story?

    Chalk one up for Wills and Kate! :)

  • Lisa #18 - March 22, 2009 at 12:24 am

    Rosemary, do you mean the publishers Clearing house? You know where ED McMahon comes to your door and brings prizes? Did Ed McMahon bring Beth Davenport Prince William\’s baby?

  • Roseary #19 - March 22, 2009 at 12:43 am

    You are being bad people, like mentally ill and stalkers it is hate. Clearance house, clarance house. I am sorry for the bad wording.

  • Roseary #20 - March 22, 2009 at 12:52 am

    Prince charles- i take william to be my husband.i met him with cowgirl boots and he said the word joy and it took 3 years with his child and csa uk for clarance house to have proff.

  • Clover #21 - March 22, 2009 at 1:00 am

    Roseary,
    Honestly, I am just trying to get to the bottom of this claim. Surely, you realize the shock and dismay your claim will be met with by just about everyone who hears it? People will most certainly question you. You do realize why?

    Importantly, how is it you dated, married and had a child with the Prince while he was dating Kate Middleton? How did you stay out of the papers?

    Are you starting to see the logistical issues your claims present for serious royal watchers?

  • mapleleaf #22 - March 22, 2009 at 1:54 am

    Either Roseary is very ill, or her words are not being translated into english correctly.

    I hope Roseary’s posts are checked by BRW, because they are not coherent, and they seem to be extremely delusional.

  • bluefire #23 - March 22, 2009 at 2:31 am
  • Shivs #24 - March 22, 2009 at 2:42 am

    Woo Woo!! Yipee! Well done Ireland for winning the Grand Slam and Six Nations yesterday against Wales!
    Prince William did a great job presenting the medals and looked charmimg and gracious with the Irish president too. Looks like he’s coming into his own and developing his ‘role’. He must be back from skiing too!

  • Redlady #25 - March 22, 2009 at 3:32 am

    I hope Roseary realises that the written word can be used in court cases!

  • just visiting #26 - March 22, 2009 at 5:54 am

    good grief

    Popped in here for a bit of happy posts to read- but now this?

  • just visiting #27 - March 22, 2009 at 6:01 am

    Roseary,

    I find it a bit strange that in one of the replies your english is perfect and others arent.

  • Kat #28 - March 22, 2009 at 7:30 am

    I have a quick question. Roseary, did this woman and William marry in a legal and binding marriage? Does she have all the appropriate papers and is the person who married them willing to testify to the wedding? Are there papers registered in a courthouse to prove this claim? Why did it take 3 years to come here? Why not the BBC or some reputable newspaper?
    Do you see why people doubt your claim? Especially because William and Kate love each other, this coming now sounds bogus.

  • Guest #29 - March 22, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Why are you people entertaining this obvious TROLL who is here only to make you all look silly???

    IGNORE TROLLS AND THEY WILL GO AWAY. There are people who do not like this site because AT ONE TIME it was not full of virulent anti-Kate hate. They come here in all forms of CRAZY to disrupt and float lies on the internet in hopes that the tabloids will run with it. These are very much coordinated disruptions of this site and others. PLEASE IGNORE THESE PEOPLE, SINCE BRW WILL NOT BAN THEM.

  • Phoebe #30 - March 22, 2009 at 7:58 am

    “Why in the these recent articals they are stating that William & Kate have been together for 5 years?”

    Perhaps they are now concluding that PW and KM were not romantically involved until after they graduated from school. That is my opinion. Or perhaps it’s a typo.

  • Guest #31 - March 22, 2009 at 8:42 am

    Because there is no known definite timeframe for when these two became a couple. I’ve seen spans of 5 to 7 years. They met in their 1st year of college, assume they became officially romantic perhaps a year or so after that. If they started school at 19 then maybe they were a couple at 20. They are both 27 this year so they’ve known each other for 8 years and have been together romantically probably for 6 to 7.

    Don’t hang on every word the papers, especially tabloids, print. They are fast and loose with facts, and this is all gossip and speculation until Kate and William sit down for an interview when their engagement is announced.

  • Guest #32 - March 22, 2009 at 8:43 am

    And even then, out of their own mouths, divide by 2 what they say publicly and what is a fact privately.

  • Phoebe #33 - March 22, 2009 at 8:58 am

    I don’t hang on everything the papers say. I’ve come to that conclusion on my own, based on what Ive seen. I still maintain that they were not “a couple” until after they left school, how soon after is unclear. Other people have different opinions. I fail to see why this is an issue worth disputing about.

  • Guest #34 - March 22, 2009 at 9:06 am

    I was not addressing my response to you specifically, but to the person who questioned the 5-yr point.

    You [COLLECTIVELY SPEAKING] or “ONE” will not find the true and correct answer to a question about their relationship from the papers. And I pretty much believe that they have been together as a couple longer than 5 years. They lived together in the latter part of their 1st year. Who knows when that relationship went past platonic, but it was pretty common knowledge during the latter part of their school years that those two were more than friends.

  • Clover #35 - March 22, 2009 at 9:41 am

    There is nothing wrong with having a bit of fun.

    I really laughed hard last night.

    I needed a good laugh when I logged on here and and found a post from someone claiming to be the mother of Prince Wiliam’s baby!

    Hilarious! I took it as a hoax when the broken English became perfect English and then back to broken English. Also, the person could not answer any of the questions I posed. It was most likely a prank.

  • Phoebe #36 - March 22, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Or another explanation for why KM has gone underground.

  • Rman #37 - March 22, 2009 at 10:08 am

    Well Phoebe, it’s known that they became a couple while they was in school but the reason why I brung that up is because every year the media say that they have been together for 5 years. Now we know that’s not right. When they was at St. Andrews, it was possible for them to keep their relationship a secret but I think in 2004, the paps spotted them and the rest is history.

  • maddie #38 - March 22, 2009 at 10:10 am

    Clover, I googled prince william beth davenport too . This is what I found. Scroll down to comments. There is one comment and guess who left it? Either Roseary is beth davenport or she is just taking her name from the comment section.http://tinyurl.com/5jgcpe

  • maddie #39 - March 22, 2009 at 10:11 am
  • Guest #40 - March 22, 2009 at 10:19 am

    LOL Great detective work maddie. LOL

    Looks like another garden variety Prince William stalker. Yes, he definitely needs police protection.

  • Clover #41 - March 22, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Maddie,
    Good work! I think Beth Davenport/Roseary WANTS to be the mother of Prince William’s baby. I just not sure she is going about in the right way. She believes she will run into Prince William in London or he will contact her at her
    yahoo address with the name Sandhurst in it.

  • Phoebe #42 - March 22, 2009 at 10:47 am

    “it’s known that they became a couple while they was in school”

    Well, I disagree about that. You and others may have concluded that, but there is no hard and fast evidence that that is true. But, we are just going over old ground here.

  • Rman #43 - March 22, 2009 at 11:01 am

    If any of you guys never got a chance to see the Service of Thanksgiving to celebrate The Queen & Prince Philip’s 60th Wedding Anniversary, now it’s on YouTube and it was a beautiful service. The video is 1-10.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLrGupQ3_gA&feature=related

    I hope in the future, we will be able to celebrate another royal couples 60th wedding anniversary.

  • mapleleaf #44 - March 22, 2009 at 11:17 am

    IMO, whoever ‘Roseary’ is, they are a delusion person who needs some serious psychiatric help.

    ‘Roseary’ writes like a stalker, and I hope this person is not being encouraged by anyone taking what Roseary says seriously.

  • mapleleaf #45 - March 22, 2009 at 11:32 am

    I read the BBC articles about Wills and Kate, and although there is no way for any of us to actually know when Wills and Kate started dating, it is known when their dating is supposed to have started.

    William and Kate became flatmates during their second year at uni. The first year they were at uni, they both lived in St. Sallies (St. Salvator).

    The fashion show was in April 2002, which was the 2nd semester of their first year. They were already friends when the fashion show took place.

    They were flatmates from September 2002 until they graduated from uni in 2005.

    According to articles from 2003 and 2004, Kate dated Rupert Finch for more than a year, and she and Rupert broke up in the latter part of 2003.

    Wills and Kate supposedly moved from being flatmates to actually dating in December 2003.

    2004 was the year that Wills and Kate went skiing together for the first time.

    If December 2003 is correct, then they’ve been friends since 2001, and in a dating relationship since December 2003.

    That’s 7 going on 8 years of friendship and 5 going on 6 years of dating.

    ;) I did wonder ( and still do!) if the reason Wills had that special dinner for Kate in the lodge/cabin at Birkhall was because it was their 5th anniversary of dating.

  • Rman #46 - March 22, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Thanks for that info Mapleleaf, the problem is that every year the tabs say they have been dating for five years. To them last year was five years and the year before that is was five years. But I hope they are asked when they started dating in their engagement interview.

  • Rosemary #47 - March 22, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    I wrote to hello magazine, i hope they will show the story. i am not a troll and i answered all of clover’s questions. Prince (king) william has been seen with other women before. Why is (my) english off? March 22 2009.

  • Clover #48 - March 22, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    To start, now you are calling yourself “Rosemary” and not “Roseary.”

    You did not answer all of my questions. One important one is regarding Kate Middleton and the 5-6 years of dating PW?

    You said that you have a baby with PW who is now 3 years old?

    I am waiting.

  • takemeaway #49 - March 22, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    It would not surprise me as through out the ages royals have had illegitimate children. Some on other blogs have speculated that PW has a child with JC. If this comes out like Ms. Davenport says, it will rock the monarchy.

  • Lisa #50 - March 22, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I cannot believe we are still having this discussion and giving this poster a forum. Please can we get back to reality?

  • Kat #51 - March 22, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    Rosemary, why did you go to Hello to write your note? Why not the BBC or CNN? You have not answered any of my questions. Why come here? You are just trying to stir up trouble or turn people agains Kate. I am not only in support of her but their relationship. I have a guess. You want Williiam and with the recent magazine saying that they are getting married, you have to say something. I am still waiting for the proof of what you claim.

  • mapleleaf #52 - March 22, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Takemeaway, I don’t want to burst your bubble, but Jecca Craig does not have a childn, or if she does, she’s managed to keep it a secret from the entire world (and possibly even kept it a secret from herself! ;) )

    And if Jecca HAS managed to keep such a huge bombshell a secret from the entire world, where is the alleged child?

    And what would happen to the alleged ‘secret’ child after Jecca marries Hugh Crossley?

    :P I suspect the little green aliens that the ‘secret’ child lives with will just have to continue to keep him/her/it in their custody.

    On a serious note, I hope BRW will keep this wonderful site free of weirdos and trolls who seem to want to flame us with stories that are only one step removed from little green aliens landing their spaceships at Toronto city centre.

    It would be lovely if we could continue to have reasonable discussions and reasonable debates about the British Royal Family without the flamers and the weirdos chiming in.

  • Lisa #53 - March 22, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    Mapleleaf I fear that until William and Kate announce their engagement, we will have to put up with this nonsense.

    This weekend’s bevy of made up tabloid stories was a direct result of the media(namely Katie Nicholl) being duped by a false leak of the time and location of the annual skiing trip. This is the trade off that Wills and Kate get in exchange for 5 days of privacy. It is likely worth it to them as they have probably learned to let the media print what they like and them simply ignore it.

    I cannot imagine the backlash in the media if the french report of their pending engagement turns out to be true.

  • Clover #54 - March 22, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    Mapleleaf,
    I totally didn’t realize that takemeaway was referring to Jecca Craig! LOL! LOL! PW so does NOT have a love child with Jecca. How old would this child be?

    In one day we learn that PW has two love children! What a day!

    Kat,
    I agree with you. Until Rosemary goes to the BBC/Hello/Paris Match etc. with her child support paperwork signed by both the Prince and Clarence House she needs to keep her mouth shut.

  • mapleleaf #55 - March 22, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    Reply to Rman’s post #46:

    You’re welcome Rman. I agree, the press seems to say that Wills and Kate have been together for five years no matter how long they’ve actually been together.

    But if the original articles from 2003 and January 2004 are to be believed, they’ve been in a dating relationship for five years as of December 2008.

  • Rman #56 - March 22, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    The baby story is funny and rubbish at the same time. That’s why I have not commented on it. There are so many girls out there that want to go half on a baby with William, it’s not even funny. I think Rosemary is dreaming or having some fun with this site.

    Lisa I think that’s just what William & Kate do, ignore it. You can’t fight with the tabs and they will print lots of nonsense because there is no real stories to report on. Right know they are busy trying to turn Kate & Chelsy into enemies and what’s crazy is the other sites actually believe it. Once we start to get more royal appearences, things will get better.

    I look forward to hearing Marilyn’s show tonight.

  • Lisa #57 - March 22, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Oh I know what you mean about the posters at other site believing anything they see in print. It is truely amazing. It would be so nice to have this thing settled once and for all but I am not hopeful at this point. I just am really settleing into the belief that Wills and Kate are in no hurry for the turmoil and added duties that their marriage will bring. Thank god for the biological clock or we might have a decades to wait for these two to make things official.

  • mapleleaf #58 - March 22, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Lisa and Clover, I’m sorry I didn’t respond to your comments. I didn’t see your posts until I posted mine.

    Lisa I agree, I think the current crop of Kate Middleton stories are just media backlash and sour grapes from Katie Nicholl because she was given mis-information, and made to look foolish. (once again!!)

    The princess products article in the NoTW is totally silly, because ALL children’s party suppliers carry some sort of princess products.

    And the Chelsy and Kate ‘cat fight’ article written by Katie Nicholl is OBVIOUSLY sour grapes. Katie Nicholl is just angry because she looks like the outsider she really is. For instance, how the heck would Katie Nicholl know what Kate and Chelsy talked about?

    I doubt if anyone believes either Chelsy or Kate would actually tell Katie Nicholl what they discuss, especially when it comes to Harry and Wills and something as personal as Harry and Chelsy’s relationship.

    The article isn’t written as favourable towards Kate Middleton, so it’s a sure bet that no one who is friendly towards Kate would’ve said this to Katie Nicholl, and considering that it’s Harry and Chelsy’s relationship, I seriously doubt that anyone who cares about Chelsy’s privacy said anything to Katie Nicholl.

    That leaves the idea that Katie Nicholl made it up, which is what I think.

    :lol: LOL, LOL, Clover, I figured out that’s what JC stood for. And the ‘secrect child’ would be at least 8 years old by now, if not older.

    Wills and Jecca supposedly had their ‘childhood crush’ and ‘secret’ engagement in 2000, when they were both 18 years old. Wills will be 27 in June of this year.

  • Kat #59 - March 22, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    I saw a princess dress, wand etc. in the dress up part of a teacher’s store in the States. Could that store have been part of the conspiracy to use the royals for ones own advantage? How many stores in England, the states, etc. are in on using the RF for their own personnal gain? It boogles the mind.

  • Rman #60 - March 22, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    “Thank god for the biological clock or we might have a decades to wait for these two to make things official.”

    LOL, Lisa isn’t that the truth. I believe these two will make things official in due time. I would like them to make an appearence soon.

  • rosettaresearch #61 - March 22, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    Kat, don’t you know that Ms. Middleton took out a trademark on the word “princess” so every time is used by a party supply place, dress store, even DISNEY, they have to pay her a royalty. That’s the true source of the Middleton money. She did all this YEARS ago when she began plotting to trap William into marriage.

  • Kat #62 - March 22, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    The plot thickens.

  • Laura #63 - March 22, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    I hope i can see the baby of pw. I wonder if it has blue eyes? Lets do a show on this rumor. I do not put it past pw to cheat on kate, he has and danced with women before. God bless rosary for telling the public- its a crime to harrass any human.

  • Hale #64 - March 22, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    Katie Nicholl doesn’t just write for the DM, she also makes a living as a ‘celebrity’ royal commentator, appearing on TV for many news programmes and documentaries on the princes.

    Her recent article came across as someone desperately trying to save face, despite the fact it was covered all over with egg.

    I wonder how many news agencies and documentary makers will ask her to comment now?

    Clearly, the fact that W & K’s holiday was over before the press realised it, blatantly displayed the press are not fingers on pulse, contrary to the impression they give. They also have egg on their faces. I suspect they won’t take this lying down.

    Whilst I am gleeful of the press being made to look foolish, I can’t help but feel St.J’s better go on a charm offensive here. Even though the press are idiot they do not like to be seen as such, consequently there is not doubt in my mind they will out for blood. Whatsmore, it will be aimed directly at the golden child.

  • Donald #65 - March 22, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    I want to give the proff about pw and him cheating on kate with a catholic woman. Did you know that he emails roseary. He calls her, do you know pc (dad) knows of pw doing these things. Its hid because she is catholic.

  • Hale #66 - March 22, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    Does anyone know who the girl at Twickenham with Harry is?

  • Rman #67 - March 22, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    rosettaresearch, Party Pieces provide party supplies for children. All party supply stores will have a princess theme. The tabs is just trying to cook up a silly story on Kate. What a cold world we live in.

    Prince William has no children so lets please stop the nonsense. I know we are all getting tierd of the slow royal news but it’s wrong to start up senseless rumors.

  • Rman #68 - March 22, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    Hale, I have no idea who that girl was. She may be a friend or with one of the other guys that was with Harry.

  • Lisa #69 - March 22, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    Donald/Roseary or whoever you are…If you plan to troll on this site under different names, you might want to consider spell checking your posts so the fact that you are one in the same is not so obvious. Let me assist you…the word you are trying to use”proff” is spelled “proof”.

    Now please consider doing us all a favor and trolling to another site for awhile. This has become quite tiresome.

  • Phoebe #70 - March 22, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    She looks like his cousin Kitty and also like his cousin Laura. Also, like any number of aristo blondes that hang around the princes. They all look alike to me.

  • Hale #71 - March 22, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    Rman :lol: Personally, I do not even wish to acknowledge or respond to fantasist posters, it only encourages them.

    Ked, have you recovered from Wales’ defeat? Is that why you are not posting? Please come back and give us something to mull over.

    Meanwhile, I’m off to bed.

    Goodnight, God bless and may your God go with you.

  • rosettaresearch #72 - March 22, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    Rman, I was making fun of all the people who believe that Kate is cashing in on her royal connection through the princess themed party supplies.

  • Rman #73 - March 22, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    Oh I’m sorry rosettaresearch, this all making my head spin.

  • rosettaresearch #74 - March 22, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    S’aright. Go back and read what I wrote as someone attempting to be funny. Your head will feel much better.

  • Lisa #75 - March 22, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    So what happened on the radio report? I tried to log on but was unable? Was it canceled?

  • Kat #76 - March 22, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    Marilyn uses a magic 8 baall to pedict the wedding. The magic 8 ball said yes. It was a cute idea but I was thinking more along the lines of an insider.

  • Lisa #77 - March 22, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    A magic 8 ball? I see. Interesting.

  • Rman #78 - March 22, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    I think it’s taking her some time to upload it on her site but in awhile I think the report will be up. I think it’s nice she do these reports every Sunday. I think there should be more royal reports like this.

  • jj #79 - March 22, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    She does look very familiar but a lot of the girls that he associates with dress very similarly and are blonde so who knows…

  • atx #80 - March 22, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Hmmm…Mystery baby? Sounds like a hoax to me. I don’t think anyone here is going to take you seriously, Roseary/Donald/whatever-your-next-pseudonym-is. I’m on board with post #51. This would not be the venue to expose a story like this.

  • Clover #81 - March 22, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Lisa,
    Thanks! The proof is in the pudding! The same mispelled words under different user names. Enough said on that subject!

    Rman,
    I was wondering the same thing about the blonde girl with Harry. Were they really together, actually interacting, or were they just caught in the same frame by some random photographer?

  • Me #82 - March 23, 2009 at 9:10 am

    She’s Melinda Percy, the Girlfriend of Thomas Van Straubenzee, he also appears in the picture (s).

  • Lisa #83 - March 23, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Me, he was seated near harry,wasn’t he?

  • Me #84 - March 23, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Yes (TvS), one row below Harry. That is why the other Melinda pictures with Harry he is leaning forward to talk with her.

  • Phoebe #85 - March 23, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Melissa Percy, sister of George?

    She also looks like the woman who was behind KM coming out of Tom’s Kitchen.

  • Me #86 - March 23, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Woops Melinda

  • alsgal 18/03/09 my, my #87 - March 23, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Excuse me, there is only room for one crazy, mentally unstable stalker on this board and that here is your Alsgal. :)

    Alsgal would say she was going to get to the bottom of this but she’d rather not be reminded about what remains tattooed on her left glut (yes, smartie pants, we did manage to get 18/03/09 in Arial font all on one cheek.)

  • Stephanie #88 - March 23, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Hmmmmm ….. Rosemary’s baby? Would that then make William the Prince of Darkness???

    Sorry, couldn’t resist…

  • Me #89 - March 23, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    hahaha you just cracked the mystery.

    Actually Disney World or Looney Tunes are planning a new animated story for adults. The ideas will all come from our dear Alsgal. ;)

  • TeaTea #90 - March 23, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    Stephanie……………good one! :) :)

  • Marilyn Braun #91 - March 24, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Hi there,

    Thanks very much for mentioning my show! I’m glad you enjoy it!

    Marilyn :)

  • Lisa #92 - March 24, 2009 at 9:15 am

    Thanks for popping in,Marliyn. I heard your show offered a rather unusual method of predicting William and Kate’s possible wedding plans,LOL. Hopefully your magic 8 ball knows something we all do”t…yet ;)

  • Marilyn Braun #93 - March 24, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Well, if that method is good enough for the tabloids, it should be good enough for me. ;)

    Yes the ball did predict a summer wedding – fingers crossed that it’s right! ;)

  • Rman #94 - March 24, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Marilyn it’s nice to see you posting. You should post more often.

  • Marilyn Braun #95 - March 25, 2009 at 7:55 am

    Thanks Rman, I’ll try my best! :)

Categories
Recent Comments
  • Rmans: Pictures of the Prince of Wales starting his green tour and pics of the...
  • Rmans: Prince Charles makes Glasgow first stop on green tour- Video...
  • Me: Interesting piece, Monica Hesse studied in St. Andrews, and was 4 doors away...
  • steph: ‘Abandoned’ Duchess of York finds lucrative healing process...
  • steph: Prince William: On a somber anniversary, a fan recounts how he won her...
  • mizuniverze: @lola i think they are acting like ryan reynolds and scarlett...
  • mizuniverze: Very true Wm4King, lots of people commented on that photo that they...
  • bluefire: i think its good for km waiting if possible that they annoce their...
  • Wm4King.: Girls will be girls, agree, Mizuniverze. Travel broadens the mind.;-)
  • mizuniverze: @ Princess Eugenie’s photo..well thats what u call humor.
Pages
Royalty Sites
Share
TwitterRSS FeedYouTube Channel
Site Admin