<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal News Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:44:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: atx</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-23017</link>
		<dc:creator>atx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-23017</guid>
		<description>Woah, Jade Falzon, you might want to re-read my comment. No attack there. Just jokes! If anything, I&#039;m happy they&#039;re adding Catholics into the mix. Are you always this quick to jump into an arguement? Shame on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, Jade Falzon, you might want to re-read my comment. No attack there. Just jokes! If anything, I&#8217;m happy they&#8217;re adding Catholics into the mix. Are you always this quick to jump into an arguement? Shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade Falzon</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22896</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade Falzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22896</guid>
		<description>ATX - Why would you attack the Catholic people on this website?  Shame on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATX &#8211; Why would you attack the Catholic people on this website?  Shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22895</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22895</guid>
		<description>Well I hope Zara will be ok with her come back. She had some pretty nasty falls last year and I really wonder whether she should give the whole thing up..  I wonder what is going on with her and Mike Tindall also I would have thought that they would have been engaged by now???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I hope Zara will be ok with her come back. She had some pretty nasty falls last year and I really wonder whether she should give the whole thing up..  I wonder what is going on with her and Mike Tindall also I would have thought that they would have been engaged by now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22887</link>
		<dc:creator>Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22887</guid>
		<description>Thank you BRW for explaining that to me.  Simon Cowell is not one of my favourite people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you BRW for explaining that to me.  Simon Cowell is not one of my favourite people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atx</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22880</link>
		<dc:creator>atx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22880</guid>
		<description>Nice to see that Miss Phillips is back in the saddle doing what she loves! Best wishes to her on the way to 2012!

Adding in the Catholics should open up a new dating pool to the new generation of royals, but honestly, what would they have said if Wills, Harry, Bea, or Eugenie if they brought a non-protestant home to meet the folks? If they would have denied their kiddos to see a Catholic that would have sparked an uproar from plenty of papers. Nice to see something so archaic has been overturned. I wonder what would happen if one of them dated a Hindu or Buddhist? Don&#039;t think the RF is ready for that one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see that Miss Phillips is back in the saddle doing what she loves! Best wishes to her on the way to 2012!</p>
<p>Adding in the Catholics should open up a new dating pool to the new generation of royals, but honestly, what would they have said if Wills, Harry, Bea, or Eugenie if they brought a non-protestant home to meet the folks? If they would have denied their kiddos to see a Catholic that would have sparked an uproar from plenty of papers. Nice to see something so archaic has been overturned. I wonder what would happen if one of them dated a Hindu or Buddhist? Don&#8217;t think the RF is ready for that one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRW</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22868</link>
		<dc:creator>BRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22868</guid>
		<description>Hi Hale,

Cowell went on TV and claimed that he was ignored by the Queen at a recent function. The photo clearly shows otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hale,</p>
<p>Cowell went on TV and claimed that he was ignored by the Queen at a recent function. The photo clearly shows otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Space</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22830</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22830</guid>
		<description>Warren Peace, I like your style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren Peace, I like your style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22829</link>
		<dc:creator>Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22829</guid>
		<description>Lisa, well said.

With regards to the Queen ignoring Simon Cowell, I don&#039;t quite understand this story, as clicking the link what I see is a picture of the Q shaking hands with the acerbic Mr Cowell.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165217/What-wear-youve-got-red-hair--Fergie-breaks-basic-fashion-rule.html

Meanwhile the above link is a story about Fergie.  She looks awful in this dress.  Doesn&#039;t she no longer represent weightwatchers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, well said.</p>
<p>With regards to the Queen ignoring Simon Cowell, I don&#8217;t quite understand this story, as clicking the link what I see is a picture of the Q shaking hands with the acerbic Mr Cowell.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165217/What-wear-youve-got-red-hair--Fergie-breaks-basic-fashion-rule.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165217/What-wear-youve-got-red-hair&#8211;Fergie-breaks-basic-fashion-rule.html</a></p>
<p>Meanwhile the above link is a story about Fergie.  She looks awful in this dress.  Doesn&#8217;t she no longer represent weightwatchers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22828</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22828</guid>
		<description>No Kate again,huh? Well at least they can&#039;t accuse her of falling out of nightclubs drunk at 4am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Kate again,huh? Well at least they can&#8217;t accuse her of falling out of nightclubs drunk at 4am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren peace</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/03/27/royal-news-links-213/comment-page-1/#comment-22826</link>
		<dc:creator>warren peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=2824#comment-22826</guid>
		<description>More news to add.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165235/The-Punchbowl-gets-Royal-seal-approval--visit-Prince-William.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More news to add.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165235/The-Punchbowl-gets-Royal-seal-approval--visit-Prince-William.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165235/The-Punchbowl-gets-Royal-seal-approval&#8211;visit-Prince-William.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.331 seconds -->
