Video: In Private In Public – Prince And Princess Of Wales
Host Alastair Burnet presents an all-encompassing look at the day-to-day lives of Princess Diana and Prince Charles. Contains footage of the two fulfilling their royal obligations, their family life, plus tours of the U.S. and Australia…
March 28th, 2009 04:55
does this video not indicate how fickle the pretend emotions of a royal prince can be. demonstrating what seems to be a husband and father figure for public consumption whilst at exactly the same time having affairs with at least three mistresses.
if that behaviour is acceptable in a family what are the odds of continuation into the next generation and so by example does william hold the same contempt for loyalty and fidelity.without evidence to contrary has william demonstrated his being a chip off the same block.
March 28th, 2009 09:50
Thanks for sharing this video. I remember seeing it around the time it was first broadcast. There are actually two books based on these videos – one has the same title as the video. The other is called In Person: The Prince and Princess of Wales (which was done earlier because Harry is a baby in that one). Both by Alistair Burnett. You can find the video on YouTube, I think it’s called ‘Diana and her boys’. Although no doubt a PR exercise, these shows are still enjoyable to watch, even if the ultimate ending for Charles and Diana is sad.
March 28th, 2009 10:00
Deacon, I am interested in hearing your opinion on why PW continues this relationship and envolves KM family into it too? Does his PR team realise that going on another Midd family vacay just makes it appear like they are “going to the chapel?” I just can’t help but feel like KM is caught in the middle of this by trying to please her parents and PW. I think what she wants, feels, thinks gets lost between her own families ambitions and RF. IMO.
March 28th, 2009 10:03
I’m glad you put it up Steven, it really is a nice video and it’s was nice to see a young royal couple supporting the Monarchy.
deacon, it’s true Charles made some very bad mistakes and it just wasn’t good for the Monarchy but Charles was pretty lost back then. I think he learned a lot about life in his marriage to Diana and what’s more important than duties and being a future king.
William being their eldest son, witness first hand what his parents went through and how it really effected his mother. He was there to comfort her when she was down and he use to push tissues under the bathroom door when Diana was in there crying. When the marriage was really breaking down, he was told by his mother at young age that there was a third person in his parents marriage and the pressure from the media was another factor. I don’t have to know William to say that all of this, including his mothers death had a horrible impact on him and his brother. They have seen the woman that helped their parents marriage go down in flames and embarrassed the family so it’s most likely the cycle of royal infidelity has been broken and lessons has been learned.
The steadfast loyalty and devotion between this new royal couple (William & Kate) is beyond amazing and it goes unnoticed. We have no idea what will happen if these two get married and most likely they will but the way they are taking their time with the relationship and the way they somehow mantain a private life, should tell us all that they may have learned from the past and taking on a new direction so the past mistakes can be avoided and the future on the Monarchy be bright. I get the feeling that now the past Kings & Queens of Britain will be able rest once William takes the throne.
March 28th, 2009 10:18
Deacon,
Excellent point. I do believe Prince Charles was confused beyond belief about the proper way to love, be married, or to go about family life.
I agree with Rman, Prince Charles has learned a great deal over the years. He has learned the hard, hard way. A beautiful young woman and mother lost her life along the way, all part of Prince Charles’ education.
Hopefully, Prince William, who was exposed to the same brutal, tragic lessons as his father has learned a great deal along the way as well.
Gracie,
I am also without answers about the way the Middleton family fits into the relationship between PW and KM. We will just have to wait for the inevitable tell-all books that will come out in the future.
March 28th, 2009 11:03
Clover I agree and I think the way Charles lost Diana is something that hurts him deeply to this day.
I think it was a bit overwhelming for the Middletons at first to have their eldest child dating the second in line to the throne. But over the years they have embraced him and I think that is not only due to him liking a close family but he has a great charm about him and a good heart. I think it’s also a burden lifted off Kate’s shoulders that he actually gets along with her family and her family gets along with him. It’s just a total blessing for a couple to have family bonding. I don’t think any of us should have a problem with William spending time with her family. I notice that The Countess of Wessex father spends lots of time with the royal family and he can be often seen riding in the carriage with the royals for royal ascot. Although it’s speculated that Harry & Chelsy is no longer together now but when they was, Harry spent lots of time with Chelsy’s family and even invited her mother to CH. The young royals seem to like the family bonding thing and I think it strengthens the relationship of the couple.
March 28th, 2009 11:18
Rman,
Very insightful view of family relations while dating. I do agree with you. It may all just be the style of relating they enjoy and nothing more or less than that.
March 28th, 2009 11:33
Rman,I agree as well. This was just a family vacation. No big conspiracy. people tend to forget that W/K are into 6 or 7 years of dating. The honeymoon phase has worn off. They enjoyed that phase behind the safe walls of St Andrews away from the press and the cameras. They are likely into a comfort zone at this point which is probably why they don’t show the amount of PDA people think they should. William likely considers Kate’s family a part of his and visa versa. his stability is a blessing for him and will be very helpful as he goes forward in his life. With the tall order he is facing,he will need all the support he can get.
March 28th, 2009 11:36
Good post Lisa! I agree with all points.
March 28th, 2009 11:38
Right, he really seem to enjoy them and I’m sure if he was bothered by them he could say look Kate, I don’t want anything to do with your family but that would put an enormous strain on their relationship and he don’t want to do that. Clover, it’s like William & Kate’s efforts is being thrown out of the window and I notice that. I think even when they are married, they will remain very private as a couple because when you let the world in too much, it all can become a mess. I think they look at the Wessex’s for guidance because they are a royal couple that is devoted to their royal duties and public life but what goes on behind the closed doors of Bagshot Park is their business and that’s how they keep it.
March 28th, 2009 11:41
Not to bring politics into the mix but do any of you guys who live in the UK think William and Kate’s wedding could be affected by a strained relationship between the PM and the Queen?
March 28th, 2009 11:43
I thought the Queen wanted first born heirs either girl or boy to inherit the throne. Most countries have done away w/the heir being male only. I also don’t see what the problem is w/allowing heirs to marry Catholics, if they are currently allowed to marry other religious backgrounds. This is a modern world, not the Tudors and Catholics should not be treated like third rate citizens. If William and Kate are over the honeymoon stage and have settled into the comfort stage then there is no need for a marriage.
March 28th, 2009 11:45
Lisa that was beautifully said.
March 28th, 2009 11:49
Lisa, only if KM is catholic which I have not heard her to be. But I can see your point as if I am not mistaken, the PM has to write off on a royal wedding? So Brown could make it difficult to get the sign off if the Queen won’t work w/him on other matters. Good question. Just a quess though. I would imagine that most royal brides would do as Autumn did a renounce their faith to marry the prince, especially one so close to the throne. I have heard that CD was catholic, but I would think she would renounce for PH to marry.
March 28th, 2009 11:50
Thanks Clover,Rman. I sometimes think people just expect too much from these two. If they choose to marry,these years will have provided a solid foundation and will likely aid in a successful marriage. I think they are fine right now but I am still back and forth on what the future will bring for them and I cannot quite figure out the delay in making things official. These are just too many possibilities.
March 28th, 2009 11:51
Lisa, sorry did not read the part about those living in UK, which would not include myself!
March 28th, 2009 11:52
Lisa, do you think that is what Deacon meant by government influence?
March 28th, 2009 11:52
“If William and Kate are over the honeymoon stage and have settled into the comfort stage then there is no need for a marriage.”
LOL true but I think they know that they have to make it official in order to move forward. The samething happend to the Wessex’s after years of dating, they made it official so they could move forward.
March 28th, 2009 11:54
Kate is Anglican,so no worries there. I have just been reading various reports on what is being proposed by the PM and was wondering his he and HM are seeing eye to eye on it. William’s wedding is a state event and the PM will be involved so if relations are strained, it may cause HM to put things on hold until a better time. I really know very little about the dynamics of the Queen/PM relationship so I may be off base.
March 28th, 2009 11:59
locksmithoflove,
“If William and Kate are over the honeymoon stage and have settled into the comfort stage then there is no need for a marriage.”
Ever heard of the concept of family? Some people do like to have children within the context of marriage. It has not been a Windsor trend to have heirs to the throne out of wedlock.
March 28th, 2009 12:05
I have no idea what faith Kate and her family is associated with but if she was catholic, she would most likely renounce it in order to marry William.
March 28th, 2009 12:08
Thanks Lisa for letting us know that Kate is Anglican because I had no idea.
March 28th, 2009 12:14
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/5065063/Gordon-Browns-assault-on-the-traditions-of-the-monarchy-is-preposterous.html
In this article,Kate’s faith is mentioned.
March 28th, 2009 13:03
the honeymoon period with rf is followed by cheating period with lots of that, then divorce period.in history where does that leave william and catherine now
March 28th, 2009 13:14
deacon, lets hope that lessons as been learned and William & Kate won’t have to deal with any of that. We must understand that just because his father did it, does not mean William will do it. Lets hope that William will not put Kate through what his mother went through.
Thanks for letting me know Lisa, I really didn’t read that artical all the way through.
March 28th, 2009 13:34
Hello! Speaking of religions (and remembering the act of settlement) – what would everyone do with william’s choice if his bride were muslim for example, not anglican, not even of christian faith? What if? Just a thought…
March 28th, 2009 13:37
deacon,
I have to side with Rman’s logic on this one, no child is destined to follow the exact same path as their parents or blood relative when it comes to commitment to a spouse.
WE have no foundation on which to say with any degree of certainty that Prince William is detined to divorce and marital infidelity.
March 28th, 2009 13:49
The Queen is in her early eighties and she knows that Charles will have a shorter reign so the future of the Monarchy lies in William’s hands and just the way he is being careful with his relationship with Kate tells her that the Monarchy’s future is bright and the past has taught him a lot.
Now I’m wondering if Her Majesty is having talks with PM Brown about William & Kate.
March 28th, 2009 14:21
Rman, having respect to your ardent loyalty to Kate Middleton I must add that I did not mean that PW and KM are not an item or not destined to become our royal couple officially. I just would like to know hypothetically what resonance it will make in society if close in line to the throne (ok, not PW) makes such a decision. Still hope you will respond me politely.
March 28th, 2009 14:22
if william cheated on her when in the first flush of the relationship and with his family history it is reasonable to think he would cheat as a relationship becomes stale. he doesnt have a senior relative (HM and possibly Edward excepted) who has a good history of fidelity. what makes him so different
March 28th, 2009 14:48
PW is very much like his father in that he is supremely self-indulgent.
March 28th, 2009 14:54
deacon and ursula,
The behavior of one’s family members and blood relatives is not sufficient proof that one will behave in the exact same way. Family history at large does not form the basis of a good argument. You will have to do much better than that.
March 28th, 2009 15:07
First time of course I will respond to you in a polite way. That would be an interesting issue, if that was to happen. I hope you don’t think of me as a mean person because I’m not. LOL, I’m not Simon Cowell.
deacon I understand what you are saying completely but William has an experience that no other royal heir has ever experienced. In the past royal children was locked away with their nannies and boarding schools so they did not witnessed first hand the royal infidelity between their parents. Charles didn’t like his children to have knowledge of what was going on with his marriage to their mother but Diana briefed William on these things. When books by Andrew Morton and James Hewitt was getting ready to come out, Diana went to the school William was attending at the time and told him what was going on. She wanted to educate him on these things because she knew he was going to be the future of the Monarchy. To many it was too much for him to know at such a young age but I’m glad she did this because she knew that this old school, royal cycle had to be broken
if the Monarchy wanted to survive. That is why many people in her royal environment was upset with her and even Camilla was scared of Diana simply because Diana was not hip to that old-school game. The late Princess of Wales not only help change the Monarchy for the better but she opened new doors for future royal brides.
March 28th, 2009 15:07
Much better than what? PW’s behavior shows that he is self-indulgent, like his father. How many ways can I say it?
March 28th, 2009 15:24
Ursula, Diana shook the Monarchy up a bit and made them realize that in order for a couple to do their duties and support the Monarchy, that old-school game of infidelity would have to stop, she helped them realize that future royal wives should have more experience before marriage. The Countess of Wessex really benefited from this by being exposed to royal life before her marriage, samething is being done to Kate. We can only pray that the seeds Diana planted into her sons will grow and prevent these past things from happening again.
March 28th, 2009 15:29
listed on here somewhere are named the positive cheating relationships that he has had since starting with her so if he did it when they were newly attached why will he not do it again.
March 28th, 2009 15:33
diana did cheat on charles whilst still married with hewitt possibly in retaliation but she did cheat not once but often so how could she justify infidelity to rf
March 28th, 2009 15:39
Rman, thank you. You are a Nice person. As for PW, I am convinced he is able to be loyal to his lover, and especially to his future wife. We all know what his early years were like, when there was that unfair triangle in his mother’s life. I think PW would not risk his reputation too. He is too smart for that.
March 28th, 2009 15:50
Clover, the history of the RF could not have been a truthful one if one did not take into account all of the out-of-wedlock children that are born that no one sees or hears from. How do we not know that the Windsors are not different? One of many Prince Andrew’s god children is Koo-Stark’s daughter, Tatiana. She’s about 12, looks remarkably like PA, but we shall never know. Prince Philip has always had rumors of another family whom he supposedly fathered. Read the history. Just because its not in the press does not mean it does not happen. Children out of wedlock to royality happens more than one thinks, they get paid for their silence. I have read that sometimes the royals make their illegitimate children godchildren.
March 28th, 2009 15:57
locksmithoflove,
Which of these illegimate children that you speak of are publicaly recognized heirs to the throne? That was my point.
March 28th, 2009 16:03
deacon, Diana was not happy in her marriage because Charles was having an affair. She became lonely, depressed and it drove her to find some comfort with someone else. This made her unhappy even more because she wanted her husband to be her partner and not anyone else. She knew that couldn’t go on and still do her duties and be a future Queen. She exposed it to let it be known that if royal marriages continued this way, the Monarchy could go down and no one wants that. After that Anne was allowed to move on and marry Tim, Andrew & Sarah was allowed to move on and Edward was allowed to date Sophie for a couple of years before marriage. I’m telling you lessons was learned and it’s a bit unfair to say William will cheat on his wife no matter what.
March 28th, 2009 16:12
Let’s also not forget that Phillip
Had cheated on the Qieen many many times & they are still married. Ok assuming happily… Hmmm Deacons posts have a very familiar ring to them..
March 28th, 2009 16:20
JJ it was said that he did but there’s no evidence that he cheated. It was even said the Queen herself had a fling but there’s no evidence of that either.
March 28th, 2009 16:20
jj,
There are rumors about Philip, what concrete evidence links Philip to a mistress are you referring too? I would be interested to see it.
March 28th, 2009 16:24
Here is the royalist artical on PM Brown’s change for the throne.
http://www.theroyalist.net/content/view/4490/1/
March 28th, 2009 16:32
Now the royal princess that really got around was Margaret and that vacation house she had in Mustique was a place where lots of things took place. There is evidence of her infidelity because her friends freely talks about it.
March 28th, 2009 17:15
deacon
I have been trying to find the names of the ladies Prince William allegedly cheated with but can’t find any. All I found were names of girls who denied anyhing happened and said what a gentleman he was and how well behaved he was.
March 28th, 2009 19:04
Good Evening All. Happy to meet you deacon am enjoying yours posts immensley.
Penny, would you care to share those names with us……..please, it would save me looking them up.
Several points have been raised, and I have a lot to say about those subjects, then again is there anytime I don’t have a lot to say.
Lisa, with regards to the strained relationship between Q & GB. The Queen herself asked long before GB became prime minister for the change of excluding marriage to catholics. I think that was when W was at St Andrews. I thought to myself perhaps they have a princess in mind for him.
These strained relationships isn’t caused by allowing royals to marry catholics or that first born females have the right over their younger brothers to inherit the throne. The strained relationship is due to the interference in the church of england itself. The Q is a committed christian, she is defender of the faith and head of church of england. She takes these duties seriously.
The problem here is GB is bringing politics to bear down on a church which today is not political but rather spiritual. Tony Blair was the first to interfere.
What you have to remember is TBlair & GBrown are secret republicans. They are/were constantly eating into our institutions. Reforming the House of Lords for a start, it actually costs more to run than it did before TB stuck his ore into it.
Just for the record, their is a huge debate going on about allowing gay clergy, which do exist in the church but is causing it to split. TB stuck his ore into that arguement to. See what I mean about bringing politics to bear.
Personally, the split in the church I should like to see is one which seperates itself from the government. Even if it has to seperate itself from the monarchy. Politics and Religion in my opinion should be kept seperate.
With regards to fidelity with the royals. I don’t know about the Q, that post shocked me. I personally can’t believe that one.
George VI was faithfull, as was George V. Q Vic during marriage, George III during marriage, James II and Charles I.
Its not exactly a good track record, and personally I doubt it shall ever improve. What you have to remember is these two princes are also celebrities. They don’t have to work at it, and I doubt they know how.
I do apologise Rman, I know you are a such a huge romantic, but I don’t think it does make a difference what these boys witnessed during their parents marriage. They are typical of those males who differentiate between sex and love.
I happen to think any female marrying into the RF better except that and study Queen Alexandria who was the perfect role model on how to get on with your husband when he is the biggest philandere in Europe.
As for PC, I doubt he has learnt anything or is capable of learning anything about relationships. Intrestingly, this matter came up on RIF the other day, so I apologise if I am repeating myself.
For me, the key to understanding Charles is in what he said during his engagement announcement. He said, ‘whatever in love means.’
This is a man who doesn’t know what love means, because in order to understand love he has first got to master the art of giving it.
In Charles’ eyes, Charles comes first. Even Camilla, the supposed great love of his life is neither his mistress or his wife, but instead a mother figure.
This is a man who will always feel the need to seek out reassurance from other women, constantly. However, woe betide any of those women who dare expect any reassurance from him, his response is likely to take the form of a vanishing act. Although, I have no doubt he is likely to surface from time to time, but always on his own terms.
He doesn’t know any better. He doesn’t even want to try. Charles is an emotional retard, plain and simple.
By the way, I am not a Charles hater, I happen to believe he will make a good king. I do believe his personal life leaves alot to be desired.
March 28th, 2009 19:14
Great post, Hale!!
March 28th, 2009 19:21
PW/SJP really wants to make it clear he flew economy on BA. Once agains KN fills in what Mandrake does not say and adds that the upgraded seating was given to Mr. and Mrs. Midds per PW. They must alway throw the steward into any story Ma Midds is connected to as if that was the only thing she has ever done. I wonder if Pa Midds was just hanging out w/PH on this trip, maybe soaking in the sun whilst in the jacuzzi? Who cares if PW sat economy when he takes a trip that could pay for most of the passengers on the plane? I suppose its better than chartering a Chinook, but what I really would like to know is he in the RAF or what?
March 28th, 2009 19:33
Hale wow, I really enjoyed reading your post but all we can do is hope that William has learned from the past and seen enough of his mothers tears to realize cheating on your wife just won’t do. Queen Alexandria was totally old-school and when the king was on his death bed, she sent for his mistress so she could say her last goodbye to him and pay her respects. The interesting part about that now is the a modern woman don’t easily take to this old-school game and will let it be known that they don’t play that. The royals thought Diana was a 19 year old, beautiful mouse that would roll with the flow but she turned out to be wildcat that when backed into a corner, she came out swinging and fighting like a wildcat would do. So if William is planning on walking down the isle with Kate, I think it would be wise for him to not take her steadfast loyalty and devotion for granted because everybody has a wildcat in them and the Monarchy just can’t go through that again.
March 28th, 2009 19:44
Gracie, it sounds to Alsgal as if the Middletons went on their regular ski trip and invited William along — just as they did on their family vacations in Mustique and in Spain.
Make of that what you will.
Alsgal is thinking it’s now a matter of when, not if, and no longer who but they, and no longer why but why not, and no longer well alright, but well alrighty then.
Alsgal is also riding aboard the logic train this evening and is thinking Tim Walker has probably got it right: Michael and Carole, both being former BA employees, might very well still have benefits that afforded them the upgrade.
Whether this special status allowed Mike and Carole to visit the British Airways Mile High Club whilst in flight, Alsgal cannot begin to speculate.
March 28th, 2009 19:54
LOL, I agree Alsgal.
March 28th, 2009 20:15
As much as I like Kate. I do feel Will may take on a mistress or mistresses. Being rich and privileged makes one feel entitled to be able to behave in certain ways. Also, it doesn’t help that he hasn’t dated much. I do hope she is the love of his life and he doesn’t think he is missing out on something
March 28th, 2009 20:22
Alsgal, one is never to old to enter British Airways Mile High Club and CM looks pretty fit to me! I bet she could lift her leg up if she had too. BA was the most enjoyable flight I have taken and the staff was so nice and the food tasted well! I guess anythings better than flying on a military transport plan on jump seats! So I have been to England-Gatwick to Heathrow. Got a little bus/car sick w/the riding on opposite side of the rode though. Lovely anyway.
March 28th, 2009 20:29
Gracie, one time on an Air Canada flight to Vancouver Big Al asked the Stewardess if she could help show him where the Mile High Club was located and wouldn’t you know she just stormed off in a huff, so Alsgal can only hope the air crew on BA are much friendlier. Talk about having an attitude at altitude!
Also, Gracie I did not know BA flew from Gatwick to Heathrow — almost seems like you’d be better off taking the train next time, hon.
March 28th, 2009 20:33
I am starting to think he will never marry KM. Every wrong step PW makes his PR come out w/a “golden boy” story, like flying economy. I bet he was not squished between KM and some lady w/a crying infant! Now that would be a photo op,” PW quiets screaming child while flying BA econo.” I am skeptical, I know, but he does not even want to share quarters w/military guys he is training with. Maybe BA took snapshots like they do when you enter a cruise boat, then I will believe it. Nothing is being done to improve KM reputation other than solitary confinement and that still does not keep the mags shut. I just think it looks insensitive of PW to have a night on the town while KM has to be locked up. It’s almost like she’s in the “Witness Protection Program.”
March 28th, 2009 20:42
Alsgal, this was years ago and my husband and I were stationed in Italy. I was so homesick, I left him to spend Christmas by himself in Italy so I could come back home – U.S. I can not tell you how happy I was to arrive in Gatwick, I had to take a shuttle to Heathrow, but England was so clean and no trash on the street or African prostitutes on every corner. I am not saying that to sound racist, most of the prostitutes were African immigrants just trying to make a buck and get out of Africa. The part of Italy we lived in the Italians did not like the Africans so most of the women became prostitutes, that’s all that was available to them. England looked like home, East Coast! Off subject, sorry.
March 28th, 2009 20:51
Clover
Apologies let me re-phrase. I thought it was a well known fact that Prince Phillip cheated on the Queen. I also thought that there was just a documentary which showed that? I don’t have any concrete evidence at all. I need to catch up with my reading on all of the other posts. I’ve just seen the BA story..
March 28th, 2009 21:27
Gracie,
I have to think that William and Kate have talked about the future. When I think of things in that light, I have to believe that the Middletons and the RF know what is going on with William and Kate. I just wish they would let the media in on it. Without any news from them, the media takes a bit of something and sensationalizes it. It is unfortunate that Kate gets the worst of it. I figure that the press knows that William will be King one day. They only want to report on him slightly in a negative light. They want him to give them news when he becomes king. That leaves us with Kate. It is sad that the media feels that they can play havoc with a person’s reputation. I would have hoped that the RF would have stepped in by now. Without that, William by continuing to be with Kate and her family is making a statement to her status with him. I look forward to any new developments.
March 28th, 2009 22:08
Kat I agree. The media will always do what they want to do and they are really treating Kate wrong. They really don’t have anything so they make up rubbish. The crazy thing is why do they have to be so mean? If you gonna make up a story on somebody, at least make it sound alittle bit nice. But then again we are talking about the british press. William will marry this girl because I don’t believe he would have dragged her this far, let her establish a bond with his family by letting her attend those important events and then just drop her like a hot potatoe. He spends lots of time with her and her family and no matter what the press say, he lets it be known that Kate is his woman. He may be losing a great deal of his hair but he could drop her in a minute and grab someone else but he sticks with Kate. They remind me so much of Edward & Sophie but there was not that much pressure on them because Edward is not second in line to the throne. If the internet was so advanced back then, I think things would have been a liitle harder for Sophie. Sophie had a job but once her relationship with Edward became serious, she had little time for her job. She had to fit into the royal lifestyle and she attended a great deal of royal events. Now the internet is bombing more than ever and people have become more cruel than ever. Kate go on vacations with William or go to the club with him and the press turns her inside out for it. They are just not being fair to her at all and yes I hope the new royal PR will kick in and help her. She just don’t need it, she deserves it. Help her find some charities to get involed with and let her attend more royal events, put her by William’s side and make it totally clear that Catherine Elizabeth Middleton is HRH Prince William of Wales’s future consort.
March 28th, 2009 22:11
I look forward too Kat on what new developments will take place and I pray to Lord Almighty that it will happen soon.
March 28th, 2009 22:13
I did mean (booming).
March 29th, 2009 00:26
were did this article came from
March 29th, 2009 03:23
Hi bluefire,
Do you mean the video?
It was first broadcast in the UK in 1986.
March 29th, 2009 04:09
Hey, did you all see the piece in the Mail on Sunday where fellow passengers on the recent flight to ski all say that PW gave up his first class upgrade to KMs parents and PW sat in economy with KM.
March 29th, 2009 06:01
hi steven thanks for the answering my question
hi redlady were did this article came from
March 29th, 2009 07:05
Hi Bluefire
It is in the Mail on Sunday. I don’t know how to copy it here. Can you advise me please.
March 29th, 2009 08:07
Isn’t it amazing how where PW/KM sit on a plane turns into dozens of articles on the internet,lol.
March 29th, 2009 08:25
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1165515/Prince-William-flies-economy-laws-class-ski-trip.html
Here is the DM article.:)
March 31st, 2009 21:42
hi redlady judt paste it