<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal News Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:44:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/comment-page-1/#comment-25227</link>
		<dc:creator>Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3195#comment-25227</guid>
		<description>Thanks Maddie for all those links.  The thing is, I learnt some time ago, that KM never did have police protection.  It was discussed but never followed through.

Was this decision altered?

I was under the impression KM was working for her parents.  Did she resign?

Truth is, the DM is well out of the loop in so far as Royal stories go, so these days they have to make them up.

That means, they will write any junk in order to cover those spaces where they didn&#039;t ascertain enough advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Maddie for all those links.  The thing is, I learnt some time ago, that KM never did have police protection.  It was discussed but never followed through.</p>
<p>Was this decision altered?</p>
<p>I was under the impression KM was working for her parents.  Did she resign?</p>
<p>Truth is, the DM is well out of the loop in so far as Royal stories go, so these days they have to make them up.</p>
<p>That means, they will write any junk in order to cover those spaces where they didn&#8217;t ascertain enough advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/comment-page-1/#comment-25220</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 03:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3195#comment-25220</guid>
		<description>http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2009/05/22/queen-heinz-leigh/


update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2009/05/22/queen-heinz-leigh/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2009/05/22/queen-heinz-leigh/</a></p>
<p>update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/comment-page-1/#comment-25144</link>
		<dc:creator>maddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3195#comment-25144</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1186240/EPHRAIM-HARDCASTLE-Why-Vince-Cables-hero-Genghis-Khan.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1186240/EPHRAIM-HARDCASTLE-Why-Vince-Cables-hero-Genghis-Khan.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1186240/EPHRAIM-HARDCASTLE-Why-Vince-Cables-hero-Genghis-Khan.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/comment-page-1/#comment-25136</link>
		<dc:creator>maddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3195#comment-25136</guid>
		<description>Do the so called journalists at the DM ever come up with anything original besides Kate is workshy or waity katie. Yawn !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the so called journalists at the DM ever come up with anything original besides Kate is workshy or waity katie. Yawn !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddie</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/05/21/royal-news-links-235/comment-page-1/#comment-25135</link>
		<dc:creator>maddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3195#comment-25135</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else read this?    

http://www.morungexpress.com/entertainment/23821.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else read this?    </p>
<p><a href="http://www.morungexpress.com/entertainment/23821.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.morungexpress.com/entertainment/23821.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.309 seconds -->
