<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: £590 Royal Swans: William &amp; Catherine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:24:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27248</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27248</guid>
		<description>I agree Fiametta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Fiametta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiametta</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27247</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiametta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27247</guid>
		<description>My guess is that Ms. Middleton spoke at the event because it was a way to demonstrate that she is actually working -- or, at least, acquiring knowledge relevant to her work for her family&#039;s company.  She surely would not have chosen to speak while out shopping or engaging in something purely recreational.  I therefore imagine that Clarence House had no problem with her saying a few words.  Given the circumstances and the nature of the video, she was not being interviewed by a tabloid reporter but rather by someone charged with promoting this professional seminar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that Ms. Middleton spoke at the event because it was a way to demonstrate that she is actually working &#8212; or, at least, acquiring knowledge relevant to her work for her family&#8217;s company.  She surely would not have chosen to speak while out shopping or engaging in something purely recreational.  I therefore imagine that Clarence House had no problem with her saying a few words.  Given the circumstances and the nature of the video, she was not being interviewed by a tabloid reporter but rather by someone charged with promoting this professional seminar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27246</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Buckingham Palace did that. I&#039;m still shocked that we lost Michael but I&#039;m sure his family and fans is glad that Buckingham Palace paid tribute to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Buckingham Palace did that. I&#8217;m still shocked that we lost Michael but I&#8217;m sure his family and fans is glad that Buckingham Palace paid tribute to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP and MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27240</link>
		<dc:creator>BP and MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27240</guid>
		<description>http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/07/15/buckingham-palace-guards-play-michael-jackson-hits-115875-21520329/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/07/15/buckingham-palace-guards-play-michael-jackson-hits-115875-21520329/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/07/15/buckingham-palace-guards-play-michael-jackson-hits-115875-21520329/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perfect</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27239</link>
		<dc:creator>perfect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27239</guid>
		<description>I figured it out. Her voice is niceee... she always says intresting for some reason...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured it out. Her voice is niceee&#8230; she always says intresting for some reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27238</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27238</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199478/Middle-class-orgy-manor-house.html

view this Kate Middleton bellow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199478/Middle-class-orgy-manor-house.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199478/Middle-class-orgy-manor-house.html</a></p>
<p>view this Kate Middleton bellow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perfect</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27237</link>
		<dc:creator>perfect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27237</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t hear kate&#039;s voice!!! do u have to register????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t hear kate&#8217;s voice!!! do u have to register????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sojourner</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27236</link>
		<dc:creator>sojourner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27236</guid>
		<description>You know what?

I expected Kate&#039;s voice  would be nicely mellifluous); it was. Given the context, I assumed Kate&#039;s words would be reasonably bland yet complimentary; they were. I even thought the venue a good move; patronizing a cutting edge event, related to her interests is quite royal of her.  ;-) 
Finally, about KM&#039;s looks: she looks like a lot of other 20 somethings. All of you over thirties --  while still in your twenties, did you not make that hideous makeup mistake of following that hideous make up trend?

Too much/ too dark eyeliner
Too much/ too light foundation
=
What are you trying to hide, eg. older woman trying to look young or what I call &quot;The Horrible Opposite Effect Illusion!&quot;

I fell for it. And people who see pictures from that time tell me I look younger (without peels, collagen, etc etc ) now that I did then when I was 26 and all painted up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what?</p>
<p>I expected Kate&#8217;s voice  would be nicely mellifluous); it was. Given the context, I assumed Kate&#8217;s words would be reasonably bland yet complimentary; they were. I even thought the venue a good move; patronizing a cutting edge event, related to her interests is quite royal of her.  <img src='http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Finally, about KM&#8217;s looks: she looks like a lot of other 20 somethings. All of you over thirties &#8212;  while still in your twenties, did you not make that hideous makeup mistake of following that hideous make up trend?</p>
<p>Too much/ too dark eyeliner<br />
Too much/ too light foundation<br />
=<br />
What are you trying to hide, eg. older woman trying to look young or what I call &#8220;The Horrible Opposite Effect Illusion!&#8221;</p>
<p>I fell for it. And people who see pictures from that time tell me I look younger (without peels, collagen, etc etc ) now that I did then when I was 26 and all painted up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27234</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27234</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199706/Kate-Middleton-flies-Mustique-Wills-posted-Anglesey.html

update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199706/Kate-Middleton-flies-Mustique-Wills-posted-Anglesey.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199706/Kate-Middleton-flies-Mustique-Wills-posted-Anglesey.html</a></p>
<p>update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soapstar</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/07/11/590-royal-swans-william-catherine/comment-page-3/#comment-27233</link>
		<dc:creator>soapstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3558#comment-27233</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the photos Mathilde. Yep, it&#039;s definitely not the same woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the photos Mathilde. Yep, it&#8217;s definitely not the same woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.335 seconds -->
