<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Sarah Ferguson Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/</link>
	<description>All the latest royal relationship news and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: r.riley</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29230</link>
		<dc:creator>r.riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29230</guid>
		<description>Roman has made excellent coments concerning Sarah. There is no reason she should not be called Duchess. Why should she give up being called Duchess, when she does not have to? 

Diana was divorced but still known as Princess. Neither Diana or Sarah were HRH after their divorces, but they do have every right to be referred to as Duchess and Princess, just as the Earl Spencer has ex wife called Countess Spencer.
Why should Sarah be singled out and not allowed to be called Duchess, this is a simple right she has as former wife of the Prince.
She is not HRH, but she is still Duchess.

Sarah also went to the US because it was an opportunity for her to pay off her enormous bank debts. after the divorce(which the UK press was on her constantly about.) She did what she needed to do and paid her debts. If she had stayed in the UK and remained in debt, not paying them off, the press would still have complained about her. She did what was best to pay off her enormous bank drafts. The Americans were willing to pay her well, so she took the U.S. contracts and now she is debt free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roman has made excellent coments concerning Sarah. There is no reason she should not be called Duchess. Why should she give up being called Duchess, when she does not have to? </p>
<p>Diana was divorced but still known as Princess. Neither Diana or Sarah were HRH after their divorces, but they do have every right to be referred to as Duchess and Princess, just as the Earl Spencer has ex wife called Countess Spencer.<br />
Why should Sarah be singled out and not allowed to be called Duchess, this is a simple right she has as former wife of the Prince.<br />
She is not HRH, but she is still Duchess.</p>
<p>Sarah also went to the US because it was an opportunity for her to pay off her enormous bank debts. after the divorce(which the UK press was on her constantly about.) She did what she needed to do and paid her debts. If she had stayed in the UK and remained in debt, not paying them off, the press would still have complained about her. She did what was best to pay off her enormous bank drafts. The Americans were willing to pay her well, so she took the U.S. contracts and now she is debt free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29229</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29229</guid>
		<description>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/equestrianism/6105384/Zara-Phillips-just-wants-to-be-one-of-the-gang.html

update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/equestrianism/6105384/Zara-Phillips-just-wants-to-be-one-of-the-gang.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/equestrianism/6105384/Zara-Phillips-just-wants-to-be-one-of-the-gang.html</a></p>
<p>update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29228</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29228</guid>
		<description>well this slow news week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well this slow news week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keysmom</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29227</link>
		<dc:creator>keysmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29227</guid>
		<description>Chris, Sorry was unaware that S,DoY still received money monthly from the RF. I assumed her divorce settlement was the end of the RF&#039;s financial commitment to Sarah. Like Rman, I will agree to disagree. But it seems to me that no matter what Sarah chooses to do for work the media will find out &amp; comment on it. What could the poor woman possibly do to avoaid the limelight? Once bitten.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, Sorry was unaware that S,DoY still received money monthly from the RF. I assumed her divorce settlement was the end of the RF&#8217;s financial commitment to Sarah. Like Rman, I will agree to disagree. But it seems to me that no matter what Sarah chooses to do for work the media will find out &amp; comment on it. What could the poor woman possibly do to avoaid the limelight? Once bitten&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYme</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29225</link>
		<dc:creator>NYme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29225</guid>
		<description>Hello everybody,

I inquired a bit, and know why kate was not with william and friends during the week holiday in cornwall ... she was at the marketing show (1er of july on wednesday) and on the 3rd she was with friends clubbing at the raffles and we known william was back on duties on the 6th of july (so probably back around the 5th).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everybody,</p>
<p>I inquired a bit, and know why kate was not with william and friends during the week holiday in cornwall &#8230; she was at the marketing show (1er of july on wednesday) and on the 3rd she was with friends clubbing at the raffles and we known william was back on duties on the 6th of july (so probably back around the 5th).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad luck</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29224</link>
		<dc:creator>bad luck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29224</guid>
		<description>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/2613303/Prince-robbing-pair-arrested-in-seconds-by-security.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/2613303/Prince-robbing-pair-arrested-in-seconds-by-security.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/2613303/Prince-robbing-pair-arrested-in-seconds-by-security.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29223</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29223</guid>
		<description>At the moment they are sleeping in Balmoral in separate rooms, perhaps they crawled throught the secret passages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment they are sleeping in Balmoral in separate rooms, perhaps they crawled throught the secret passages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefire</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29222</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29222</guid>
		<description>well what the next events of wills  and kate after the mystique vacay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well what the next events of wills  and kate after the mystique vacay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rman</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29218</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s okay, we can agree to disagree on this but the media pretty much treat the royals like celebrities today. The paps follow them like they are celebrities, the tabs write about them like they are celebrities and the royals are pretty much popular like celebrities. Of course we can try to set the royals apart from everyday celebrities but all together, they are just well known people that do different and extraordinary things. 

I just see Sarah has a true survivor for making out alive from the hole she was in all those years ago. The royals treated her badly and the media got very nasty with her. Even though she has fought her way back to the top and live a much healthier lifestyle, I just find it cold to throw her painful past back into her face. The British press always manages to do that and I hope the British people is not that cold. 

Diana was on a path to gaining her life back and looking for more serious causes to support, that all came to an end in Paris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s okay, we can agree to disagree on this but the media pretty much treat the royals like celebrities today. The paps follow them like they are celebrities, the tabs write about them like they are celebrities and the royals are pretty much popular like celebrities. Of course we can try to set the royals apart from everyday celebrities but all together, they are just well known people that do different and extraordinary things. </p>
<p>I just see Sarah has a true survivor for making out alive from the hole she was in all those years ago. The royals treated her badly and the media got very nasty with her. Even though she has fought her way back to the top and live a much healthier lifestyle, I just find it cold to throw her painful past back into her face. The British press always manages to do that and I hope the British people is not that cold. </p>
<p>Diana was on a path to gaining her life back and looking for more serious causes to support, that all came to an end in Paris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathilde</title>
		<link>http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2009/08/27/video-sarah-ferguson-interview/comment-page-2/#comment-29217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/?p=3807#comment-29217</guid>
		<description>Nats Rufus went to her friend&#039;s hen weekend on Aug 21, so she could not be anywhere else but in UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nats Rufus went to her friend&#8217;s hen weekend on Aug 21, so she could not be anywhere else but in UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.354 seconds -->
