Posh Nightclub Promoter moves in on Chelsy Davy

Hugo TaylorPrince Harry is apparently furious after Chelsy Davy was spotted getting friendly with reknowned playboy Hugo Taylor at a nightclub opening. Monsters & Critics reports

A source said: “Harry was furious when he heard Chelsy was with Hugo at Chinawhite. Hugo had told a number of pals that he’s got his eye on Chelsy, and as they are all in the same circle of friends it got straight back to Harry.”

Hugo is the new promoter of Chinawhite and is a well-known player who has been linked to Harry’s cousin, Princess Eugenie. The source added to Britain’s Daily Star newspaper: “On the night of the party Hugo doted on Chelsy. He made a beeline for her as soon as she arrived, and he bought her drinks for the whole night.

“The VIP area in the club is tiny, and she spent most of the night at his table, where they were chatting and dancing. Harry told pals he couldn’t believe Chelsy went to the club just to see Hugo. He isn’t at all happy about it.”

63 Responses to “Posh Nightclub Promoter moves in on Chelsy Davy


  • Katharine
    October 31st, 2009 05:39
    1

    Well, IF this is true, Harry should do some serious thinking. Clearly, the gal loves to party and, IMO, she needs/craves the attention this lifestyle gives her–especially as PH’s girlfriend. Has ANYTHING really changed since their last breakup?? I don’t see it.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 07:31
    2

    Well, while I doubt this story is true, it would not surprise me. Chelsy seems like a girl who is set on remaining true to herself and not bending her lifestyle to suit anyone else. I am personally not convinced by one picture exiting a club,that these two are even a couple at this point.

  • Katharine
    October 31st, 2009 07:56
    3

    I agree Lisa. Maybe the whole “back together” story was started just to sell papers.

  • P
    October 31st, 2009 09:57
    4

    I totally agree with you Lisa. I don’t belive about Harry to be furious, unhappy, worried, etc., with what Chelsy does or not does, neither they are back together bc of a few pics of them leaving a club together or traveling in Africa. Maybe they tried to back but it didn’t work. I’m saying this because they didn’t have the same discret profile of K & W – neither when they try to be discret – so if they were back together I think they weren’t be so good in hide it for all this time.
    And I find very curious the stories about Chelsy nights without Harry and the way that his feeelings and reactions have been discribed since the break up, it seems the same terms they used to discribe Kate in the latest years and the same stories about Wills and others ladies in nightclubs. It’s more or less like: “Chelsy/Wills have a lot of fun in other romantic company while Harry/Kate are at home sad and jealous”. Does anyone remember the articles about Wills with Isabella, Jecca or other girl and Kate being furious? To me they just changed the persons what makes me don’t believe in neither of these stories.

    Sorry for the English. I hope you can understand me.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 10:06
    5

    I understood you fine,P. Thanks for posting! I agree with your thoughts

  • sojourner
    October 31st, 2009 10:09
    6

    I was looking for the picture, of them leaving the club together… or in the club together… or anywhere close to each other on that night…

    Though I agree with Lisa’s assessment of CD, something else might be at play here too. With the recession, and the utter dearth of any intrinsically interesting royal news, we will be seeing lots more made up reports by “royal reporters” trying to eek out a justification for their titles and employment. We should feel a little sorry for them…. ;-)

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 10:20
    7

    sojourner, you are 100% correct. Even in times when there is “news” to report,I think 75% of what we read is made up or at least embellished to make it more interesting to read. The main reason why the tabs keep writing about the engagement is because when it comes,it guarantees these writers stories for years to come and that translates to job security. Wait til the engagement comes,LOL. The stores these people will come up with will boggle the mind. They probably have then written already,they are just waiting to insert the details,LOL.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 10:35
    8

    Apparently Kate arrived back at Heathrow today and was snapped by the paps. She is covering her face,though. She must be living in London as we suspected…I wonder if we will hear more about this over the weekend?

  • jj
    October 31st, 2009 11:04
    9

    Lisa from where? Any pictures or links?

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 11:05
    10

    I don’t see why her arriving back at Heathrow is evidence that she is living in London. It is on the border with Berkshire. My thought was that she was coming back from New York.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 11:06
    11

    http://tinyurl.com/yzlt8up

  • jj
    October 31st, 2009 11:10
    12

    Bummer NYC?? I’m there for the weekend! ahh I would have loved to have bumped into Kate. Thanks for the link to the picture.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 11:23
    13

    No evidence that she was coming back from NYC. Just speculation on my part. But there has to be a reason she was using Heathrow instead of Gatwick, and >45% of passenger traffic through Heathrow comes from NYC. Per Wikipedia.

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 11:39
    14

    There really is no telling where she is coming from but those are some very interesting pictures.

    I know after all this time Kate must be getting sick and tired of having to go through something like this without some kind of security holding these photographers back.

  • Katharine
    October 31st, 2009 11:41
    15

    True Rman, and it appears she handled it calmly–no drama.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 11:49
    16

    Thanks for the link,Phoebe. Odd how there is not another soul in those pictures. I thought Heathrow was so busy…

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 11:51
    17

    I would like to see better pictures than this.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 11:56
    18

    Yeah,she really did not give the pap anything to work with…LOL.

  • P
    October 31st, 2009 12:06
    19

    She should be more careful with her bags. They are always open.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 12:14
    20

    Tough to be zipping your bag when you busy holding your hand in front of your face to avoid being snapped. I think this is a new stradegy to lower the value of the snaps.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 12:35
    21

    It depends when her flight arrived, and how many flights were arriving at the same time.

  • Britt
    October 31st, 2009 12:38
    22

    I’ve suspected that strategy for sometime. I don’t see it having a longterm effect though. It will only make the paparazzi work harder to achieve the ‘money’ shot. Plus the ‘money’ shot in question will shoot up in value too.

    Surely just displaying a pleasant face towards the paparazzi indicates to the public that you can handle the attention and won’t be throwing unnecessary tantrums in the near future.

    I’ll never understand why the Wales brothers and their various partners refuse to act maturely with the press.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 12:38
    23

    One BA flight from Aberdeen arrived earlier today at Heathrow. That’s my guess.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 12:49
    24

    Why Aberdeen?

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 12:52
    25

    They fly through Aberdeen when visiting Balmoral. Just a guess. Wills has a cottage there, HM was at Buck all week entertaining the president of India..like I said, just a guess.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 12:54
    26

    I’ll stick with NYC, or someplace else overseas. Perhaps I am misguided, but I like to think she has a life and some interests beyond PW.

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 12:56
    27

    I’m sure she does,Phoebe. Could be a business trip as well. I do think Wills takes up alot of her time,though.

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 13:18
    28

    Well I’m not sure where she was coming from and maybe we will get an artical explaining these pictures but I would like to see some good pictures of the couple.

    I’m not sure about the whole Chelsy story. I don’t know if Harry & Chelsy is really back together and she just seems to be friendly and know this guy.

  • Guest
    October 31st, 2009 13:45
    29

    What are they….12? I’m not wild about Harry or Chelsy, but I don’t believe this story.

  • Katharine
    October 31st, 2009 14:14
    30

    Lisa, you might be right about Aberdeen.

    As for hiding her face, well I can’t blame her or the royals for doing that. It keeps the paps from making money from more valuable pictures and this is preferable to cursing them–verbally or “visually.” ;)

  • Lisa
    October 31st, 2009 14:26
    31

    She is probably doing what her lawyers have advised her to do when out without William.

  • sojourner
    October 31st, 2009 16:26
    32

    Lisa is right (maybe I should just right LIR :-) )
    To continue her claim that the paps are harrassing her, and that she does not welcome the attention, she must make this clear every time. If she wanted eventually to pursue restraining orders against any particular paparazzi, she would have to have proof of not welcoming their attention. Shots like this do it.

    It must also drive her family mad. PW apparently is not so bothered… bully for him.

  • sojourner
    October 31st, 2009 16:38
    33

    But wait!
    I just remembered that a the DM had a piece today on a flight from the US (Newark, New Jersey not NY) to London where a several passangers fainted. Greeted in Heathrow by hazmat guys in isolated strand and whatnot. Maybe she asked to be let out fast…

    Trick or Treat? Godiva’s for whomever wants them.

  • Phoebe
    October 31st, 2009 16:48
    34

    Sojourner, when one flies from New York, it can be either from Newark or JFK. They have transatlantic Europe-bound flights leaving about the same time from each place. Makes for crowded skies. Maybe the fainting incident is why there were photographers at the airport.

  • Kat
    October 31st, 2009 17:45
    35

    The news olf the 6 people who fainted on the flight was covered on Fox news. It was reported to land at Heathrow at 6:50 this morning. It was reported that no harmful substances were found. If Kate’s flight came in at the same time, she woluld have been met by the photographers.

  • Jayhawk
    October 31st, 2009 18:06
    36

    Those are very sad looking photos.

    If she is in Heathrow, I can’t believe I was just there a few weeks ago, flying to England for my studies, with my bags on the same kind of cart, pushing it around the corridors.

    Just a thought- but she might have arrived very early in the morning.

    When I traveled, because I bought a very cheap package on Priceline, I had long layovers.

    In the very early morning, the airports were practically sometimes vacant.

  • really?
    October 31st, 2009 18:28
    37

    i can make out a y on the other tag on the bag and perhaps a prior I or T for an airport code perhaps
    maybe galway?
    but not scotland

  • Clover
    October 31st, 2009 19:51
    38

    It is hard to tell when those pictures were taken. Who knows where Kate was going or returning from, not enough information in just one snapshot.

  • Clover
    October 31st, 2009 20:15
    39

    I just realized that more than one snapshot was taken of Kate at Heathrow!

    http://www.celebmad.com/users/GossipGirl/photos/index.cfm/A-shy-Kate-Middleton-is-seen-arriving-at-Heathrow/thumbs/

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 20:27
    40

    I often wonder how long can that girl put up with that? I just know there must be times when she just want to throw her hands in the air and say, “to hell with it all”.

  • sojourner
    October 31st, 2009 20:45
    41

    Phoebe,
    I was commenting how the DM made it seem that Newark was in NY. As you know, it isn’t; its in a different state though adjacent state, NJ. And there are all kinds of rivalries between the two places.
    As someone who flies in and out of NY regularly, I found the mistake amusing, mostly because Newark is a little like what Gatwick is to Heathrow: a poor relation… ;-)

  • sojourner
    October 31st, 2009 20:48
    42

    Rman,
    I quite agree with your comments about KMs patience with both paparazzi … and raise you a PWs apparent inability to protect her from them.

  • Clover
    October 31st, 2009 22:03
    43

    Usually after a flight all you want to do is go home and sleep in your own bed. Add to that the paparazzi following you around the airport!

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 22:16
    44

    It’s just crazy. I know she’s getting tired of that and I;m getting tired for her. I mean year after year she has to deal with this and it gets pretty stale after awhile.

    The process to get married to a royal today is not easy and I don’t she would wish this process on anyone. I know she can’t wait for the day that she will be able to go on and do her duties, show her personality and just leave all these years behind her.

  • Clover
    October 31st, 2009 22:20
    45

    Dating a future monarch does seems awful as far as dealing with the media and even the public. Kate needs protection, she can not go on exposed like this forever!

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 22:26
    46

    I mean, “I don’t think she would wish this process on anyone else.”

  • Rman
    October 31st, 2009 22:37
    47

    I think we all have been brain washed by the fairytale stories like Cinderella and Ariel the little mermaid because the process is nothing like that.

    Yeah she do need some protection because she should be able to go and travel without having to be harassed like that. The paps could have distance themselves and taken the pictures but they got all in her grill and that’s a huge turn off.

    I just wonder how long do she have to put up with that? I hope next year things will change….in a good way.

  • Clover
    October 31st, 2009 23:01
    48

    The amazing thing is that she does put up with it all, year after year! Kate has not given up. However, I am sure she will welcome a break from all of this as soon as possible. It seems like a terrible process, dating a Prince.

  • Jj
    November 1st, 2009 00:57
    49

    The UK Express is reporting that Kate flew back from Birkhall. Looks like she was with William.

  • Jj
    November 1st, 2009 01:02
    50

    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/137494/So-what-s-changed-

  • meg
    November 1st, 2009 04:01
    51

    There are always photographers at big international airports.For a couple of them their every day job is to be at Heathrow and take snaps of famous people who arrives or departs. I have seen TV programmes about them.

  • bluefire
    November 1st, 2009 06:33
    52

    i dont think that wills is there i think kate is hate the paparazzi maybe she tired being follow

  • Perhaps . . .
    November 7th, 2009 20:51
    53

    She flew in from Anglesey. Airport code “HLY”. Close to RAF Valley, where PW is in training.

  • mapleleaf
    November 7th, 2009 21:43
    54

    According to the Prince of Wales website William is not going back to RAF Valley in Anglesey until January.

    He will continue training at RAF Shawbury in Shropshire for the rest of this year.

  • mapleleaf
    November 7th, 2009 21:44
    55

    Harry left RAF Shawbury in October to go to the AAC base in Middlewallop, but Wills is still at Shawbury.

  • Perhaps . . .
    November 7th, 2009 21:47
    56

    I read somewhere that he was supposed to do a month’s training at RAF Valley in the fall.

  • Perhaps . . .
    November 7th, 2009 21:52
    57

    Excerpt from POW website:

    PW’s current training “includes some specialist Search and Rescue training on the Search and Rescue Training Unit (SARTU) at RAF Valley in Anglesey”.

  • dagsi
    November 7th, 2009 22:04
    58

    I think William “may” be training in RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales right now. My only reference is that he attended the rugby game in Cardiff, Wales today. They usually schedule his official functions around his training and current location.

  • mapleleaf
    November 8th, 2009 00:10
    59

    :) Prince William already completed his Specialist Training at RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales during August of this year. Here is a link from a North Wales newspaper:

    http://tinyurl.com/ya6r99m

    And a few other links:

    http://tinyurl.com/m2xsc9

    http://tinyurl.com/nbxer2

    http://tinyurl.com/q59u2r

    William isn’t scheduled to go back to to RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales until January 2010. He will go there after the New Year holiday but before the trip to NZ and Australia.

    Willam has been at RAF Shawbury since January 2009 except for the 2 weeks he spent at RAF Valley, and according to the published timetable of his training he will stay at RAF Shawbury until some time in December.

  • mapleleaf
    November 8th, 2009 00:24
    60

    If anyone would like more information about William’s RAF training, here is the link to the RAF Flying Training Pipeline information for both Wills and Harry:

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/no22traininggroup/organisation/flying_training.cfm

    The RAF has a PowerPoint document that shows both William and Harry’s Flying Training Pipelines. Their training stream is on Slide #4:

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/no22traininggroup/rafcms/mediafiles/9C2CA119_1143_EC82_2E38786ECE6BE6FA.ppt

    William’s training stream is the very top one with the pale blue blocks and Harry’s is the very bottom one with the red blocks.

  • dagsi
    November 8th, 2009 05:17
    61

    Thanks for the links, mapleleaf. I wonder, though, how long William has left for training. We seem to get conflicting timelines. And is the Falklands assignment part of training? Does anyone know?

  • Perhaps . . .
    November 8th, 2009 11:49
    62

    I think it as likely that she came from Anglesey as Aberdeen.

  • Lisa
    November 8th, 2009 12:03
    63

    That’s very true as well. It will be interesting to see what information comes out once this announcement is made. I bet we get a totally different perspective on things.