Comments on: Royal News Links

By: bluefire

bluefire — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:13:35 +0000

good evening

well i think kate can talk to anyone she wants well i hope we can understand everything we don’t need to be British people to understand everything

By: Kat

Kat — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:39:09 +0000

I do understand about those who are trying to inject levity into the discussion. For someone who is not British amd dpes not know William or Kate, I do tend to get serious about the discussion. Point taken about enjoying the posts of others. I am enjoying reading about what everyone has to say. I am glad that there are a lot of people on this site who are so positive about William and Kate, Rman is the rock in being so steadfast in the belief of the relationship, Mapleleaf does wonderful detective work of the internet. Lisa is so positive, Ked challenges my thinking. I think Ked is sometimes trying to tell us info without coming out and saying it. Sometimes, I think I would need to be British to understand everything. I do wish that Redlady would tell us more about what she knows. Her excitement is contagious. This is a good site.

By: sojourner

sojourner — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:28:43 +0000

Not in reference to Lisa, who I know got my joke-attempt the first two times, and in support of mapleleaf,

When people include things like :LOL: and he he he in posts, we can safely assume they are trying to inject levity into what otherwise can be abjectly ridiculous discussions.

And I personally recommend that when a post seems ludicrous or otherwise baffling, we add our own invisible emoticons, and find our own enjoyment in them.

Life is just too short (and so am I )

By: Clover

Clover — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:13:14 +0000

Lisa,
I enjoy the posts here, riddles and all! Some are mind teasers and I really like that. Different strokes for different folks, it seems to be a case of different tastes. I am not sure there is an easy solution for that.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:06:20 +0000

May I just politely point out how frustrating it is when posters make statements and never have the courtesy to clarify them when asked. It has happened a few times recently,including ked’s little riddle-esque post and it is diminishing the enjoyment of the site,IMO.

By: Rman

Rman — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:05:36 +0000

Evening,

Kate could have been talking about anyone like someone she is working with, a friend, a boyfriend of friend, a guy she ran into. It could have been anyone. Also the person could have made up the phone conversation. It’s really wrong to talk about a strangers phone conversation.

Now is James Whitaker a ‘tosser’? I think he is a bit.

By: Clover

Clover — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:42:52 +0000

Mapleleaf,
Thanks for clarifying your joke!

By: mapleleaf

mapleleaf — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:40:09 +0000

I hope no one missed the wink and the laughing in my post #183.

I thought this: and this: explained that I was telling a joke.

By: Clover

Clover — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:16:04 +0000

Hale,
Thanks for the lyrics! After reading them I am now even more confused by Ked’s post.
I really thought he meant something entirely different. I always enjoy reading Ked’s posts despite the ambiguity.

rv,
I thought the same thing! Unless she just read the 30 under 30 article in Vanity Fair where James Whitaker’s 2007 comment was repeated recently.

By: rv

rv — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:37:51 +0000

Why would Kate care or comment on something JWh has said several times before. Why would she even have a phone converse about Whitker. It does not make sense.