Kate Middleton attends movie Premiere

Kate Middleton at the OdeonKate Middleton has made a rare public appearence attending the premiere of Tenacity on the Tasman, held at the Odeon Leicester Square. The Daily Mail reports

Prince William’s girlfriend joined her friend Holly Branson at the premiere. The 27-year-old wore a light blue mini dress, blazer and boots to watch the film – which charts the story of Olly Hicks, who at 23 became the first person to row solo from America to England.

In recent weeks rumours of a royal wedding planned for 2012 have intensified…

‘Nothing is set in stone but 2012 is the date that is now being talked about… Whether William and Kate get married in 2012 or the year before, it will be the Queen who will throw them the most wonderful party and the line of thinking at the moment is that 2012 could be the perfect date.’

Photo Links: Getty Images | Wire Image | Celebrity Gossip | Rex Features

209 Responses to “Kate Middleton attends movie Premiere


  • Katharine
    November 20th, 2009 18:01
    1

    Kate looks terrific.

  • Christine
    November 20th, 2009 23:24
    2

    Well I Second That Katharine!!!!

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 02:02
    3

    Yes she really looked good and happy.

  • mariskaagusta
    November 21st, 2009 08:42
    4

    Hei kate, why wills not join together with you at that premierre ??

  • really?
    November 21st, 2009 10:04
    5

    I do love the idea of the outfit, the dress with a jacket. I also like the colour of the dress. Her Hair looks the best, I love that style. But there is something slightly off about the outfit? Like it isn’t balanced. I may be being to picky but this isn’t the best I have ever seen her. On the up side she is out with her friends which I think is good.

  • Lisa
    November 21st, 2009 10:25
    6

    Guys,Kate has been spotted at a rugby match…England Vs New Zealand

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 11:14
    7

    Morning,

    Thanks for letting us know Lisa.

  • Lisa
    November 21st, 2009 11:18
    8

    I will be out for the rest of the day, so I am relying on you guys for pictures!

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 12:46
    9

    Lisa I’m hoping some pictures will show up.

  • Clover
    November 21st, 2009 14:12
    10

    Where are the pictures?

  • Me
    November 21st, 2009 15:38
    11

    There’s a lot of tweets today of W, H, K and C, which run as follows:

    W and H: will be attending the Phantom of the Opera tonight (2-3 tweets by the same person whom apparently sings in the show; from I’m nervous, to can’t believe will be performing for W&H, to on my way to the theatre)

    K: was seen in the Rugby (1 tweet) and another tweet said she was shopping in the Givenchy Storein Kings Road (Tweet by Dean Pipper)

    C: two different tweets she was spotted last night in Embargo Club with Charlie Simpson from the band ‘Busted’.

    I guess we will have to wait and see if photos, article, or any other news outlet matches with the above tweets.

  • sojourner
    November 21st, 2009 16:35
    12

    In HOLA! there is a picture of Kate but also Jecca Craig, whom I had never seen pictured.

    http://tinyurl.com/ya3rojo

  • Clover
    November 21st, 2009 16:54
    13

    Me,
    Thanks! I hope we see lots of pictures from todya/tonight.

    Sojourner,
    Jecca is beautiful! A classic beauty IMO!

  • P
    November 21st, 2009 17:04
    14

    Beautiful? A classic beauty? Is this a joke?

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 17:53
    15

    Good Evening,

    Jecca is an okay looking girl.

    KN has an article out on Kate’s birthday and she say’s that William won’t miss this birthday like the other two.

    http://tinyurl.com/yfep7mo

    William was training during Kate’s 26th birthday but we all know that he was at her house for her 27th birthday. I would honestly like to sit with KN at her desk and help her get some things right. She just need some help.

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 17:58
    16

    I think we all know that members of the royal family will be busy in 2012 to help celebrate the Queen’s Diamond Jubliee.

    I hope and pray the Queen will still be here for her jubilee.

  • P
    November 21st, 2009 18:02
    17

    No pics yet? I’m here just waiting for something…

  • Phoebe
    November 21st, 2009 18:13
    18

    I like JC’s outfit. I think it’s really snappy. Better than her usual.

  • Rman
    November 21st, 2009 18:59
    19

    Here’s another tweet:

    Massive rumours around the Harbour City in Australia that Kate Middleton will be spending a week long holiday there in Jan next year.

    http://twitter.com/Shashavaglava

  • ked
    November 21st, 2009 20:04
    20

    Hello,

    Again I’ve been catching up on the ‘happenings’ and thgere doesn’t seem that very much has changed .

    Stories and theories abound but in all honesty non of us really know what is happening either within the RF or within the lives of PW,PH,CD,KM.

    Perhaps it’s wrong to speculate without being able to actually produce confirmation but I seem to think that PW is out of the country or at least has been out of the country but can’t really say where or why.

    We have many times thought that KM has had regular meetings with PW’s “suit people” sometimes with and sometimes without PW and about three weeks ago didn’t exactly agree or accept (dont know which) what was said but didn’t stay around to clarify matters with PW.

    Whoops!

    True or false ? Sorry can’t answer.

    Strange that we should now be classifying the regularity of the features of some of PW’s girl friends. Perhaps we should just stick to saying that KM has an ethereal aura about her and is many times more beautiful in the flesh than in photographs but for Hollywood glamour or even Miss Universe looks then ‘Lady Nats’ is the real thing. (Am I in trouble now!?)

    Better go.

  • Me
    November 21st, 2009 20:35
    21

    Beauty is in the beholders eye

  • Clover
    November 21st, 2009 20:39
    22

    Ked,
    I love your Royal Riddles I always look forward to the next one!

    I get this one! :)

  • sojourner
    November 21st, 2009 21:08
    23

    Maybe we shall to Clover’s titles “royal diviner,” because I certainly don’t get Ked’s latest.

    I also don’t get why he complains of others tossing some guesses around while his pitches are regularly wild… but maybe I simply misread.

    Thought Ms. Craig had a similar “type” to KM, as does Natasha Issacs (the Lady Nats of Ked’s post). So the boy is consistent, so far.

    Finally, when it comes to this RF, it seems that recently beauty has not been a requirement, so far ;-)

  • sojourner
    November 21st, 2009 21:12
    24

    oops! meant to say

    “Hollywood beauty has not been a requirement for too many spouses, so far”

  • Clover
    November 21st, 2009 21:54
    25

    Sojourner,
    LOL! On the beauty in the RF comment! Funny!

  • bluefire
    November 21st, 2009 22:24
    26

    i think that there dress is nice and glam

  • really?
    November 21st, 2009 22:29
    27

    Jecca looks mighty good there , like she tried came from work and did her make up and hair. She has killer legs. I saw that Hugh Crossley’s sister was to attend the event.

  • really?
    November 21st, 2009 22:39
    28

    Crap no on Lady Nats her eyes are so wide apart she looks like she has them on another head! She does dress a bit better than Kate as in designer but she is NO beauty and far from the fairest of her bunch. Now Isabella Coaten her best friend is of hollywood, she is GORGEOUS! Kate may have left a suit meeting. But what wouldn’t she like? Do they deliver PWs bad news rather than he, that they won’t marry or he is too busy? He is incredibly weak if he does that.

  • Lisa
    November 21st, 2009 23:55
    29

    Oh my the hatie katie article is one or her dumbest yet. I think she must get paid for everytime she mentions William or Kate in an article. nothing else makes sense.

  • jj
    November 22nd, 2009 00:45
    30

    I think my comment got lost some where but Rman I’ve been waiting for some crazy theory to start about Kate and Australia. IMO not going to happen because it really doesn’t need to right now… They aren’t engaged and who knows when they will become engaged. Lisa maybe you hit the nail on the head cash for PW and KM theories… I guess afterall even hatey katey needs to eat :)

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 01:40
    31

    You may be right JJ, I just posted that tweet because I thought it was interesting.

    I just remain curious JJ because we really don’t know what’s coming around the corner. I just think we are approaching the time where some of our ‘million dollar’ qusetions will get answered and that next year will be an interesting one.

  • really?
    November 22nd, 2009 01:44
    32

    Three weeks ago is the heathrow shots or thereabouts…. I don’t believe she would visit the suits without William, unless he was out of the county on official duty such as war! I don’t think they would have the time of day for her until she is engaged to him unless they were instructed to do something by him, it is william in charge of the suits not the other way around. In life you should always pick the path of least resistance when figuring things out or simply put move from point a to point b. As I see it there are only three things she could have been asked to do 1. Go into hiding/exile while pw is ‘fighting’ in Corsica or seeing someone else and not kate while holly and guy and the gang cover pw’s tracks. 2 change the date of an important event…perhaps she was to go on holiday and that isn’t going to happen now because of the overall exposure plan for william. 3 pose for paps or do more charity, change of tack and she doesn’t want to look silly doing either. Do this to take away from william being away. I wonder if he is at Lewa.

  • bluefire
    November 22nd, 2009 06:20
    33

    good morning i think about the tweet let wait and see what happen next year bye be back tomorrow

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 08:18
    34

    http://www.celebmad.com/users/GossipGirl/photos/index.cfm/Prince-William-leaving-Raffles-London-UK/thumbs/

    Prince William leaving Club Raffles last night. (Alone)

  • ked
    November 22nd, 2009 08:31
    35

    Rman,

    Like it or not I think the $1M has either not been asked ,or shock horror, declined .

    Enough said for now!

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 08:41
    36

    Perhaps that is why PW was seen alone in Raffles.

    Gossip know

  • meg
    November 22nd, 2009 08:41
    37

    Well, these two mustnt like to spend time together. He’s only in London for the weekends and goes out on his own. I’m really starting to doubt if they are together at all. Are the competeing on who can smile the most when they are out on their own. A competition about who is happiest alone? If they are still together, they are just silly with their games. But I’m afraid those people here and on the other boards that never believed in any marriage, could be right. Unfortunately.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 08:49
    38

    http://www.britishroyals.info/

    A smiling Prince William is pictured leaving Raffles Nightclub, London – 21 Nov 2009. No sign of Kate … Rumour has it that William and Harry attended a private event at the Ritz earlier in the evening.

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 09:06
    39

    Good morning all. ked, thanks for posting but none of us knows if the question has been asked and what the response is.

    What the heck happened to William’s hair..it looked so good a few weeks ago. UGH.

  • Britt
    November 22nd, 2009 09:25
    40

    Am I the only one who finds it completely normal for William and Kate to go out separately? Just because William left Raffles alone doesn’t mean he cheated on Kate with the Buckingham Palace maid and a catastrophic breakup is imminent! When I was in a relationship a year ago me and my boyfriend would go out separately despite being in the same city and no-one questioned our relationship. Why should Kate and William be any different?

    Perhaps the reason for Kate’s absence is that shes smart enough to not get photographed leaving a VIP club knowing full well the horrible media criticism that will follow it!

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 09:39
    41

    Britt,I agree 100%. In fact when was the last time Will and Kate were seen clubbing together? 2008 is the answer,I believe. I think they have gone out of their way to avoid being seen clubbing together and have kept their “public” appearances to things like Polo Starlight etc. very smart,actually and likely the work of Mr PR guy.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 09:44
    42

    December 2008 Whisky Mist was the last time they where photographed together. It was a Christmas celebration for their 30 crowd friends.

  • P
    November 22nd, 2009 09:46
    43

    As my mother says the worst in a relationship (date or marriage) isn’t the relationship but the fact people don’t accept you go out without your partner, as the right is ‘once you are a couple you should be together all the time in all the places’.

  • really?
    November 22nd, 2009 09:47
    44

    Now Ked you are being a horrible tease with Rman and it isn’t nice! It is one thing to make a claim and another to direct it to a most loyal and genial fan. We don’t know anything at this point. I am ok with discussing possibilities but I find your post in bad taste. Where is Tom Van and the others who have come to her aide in the past? Why is she out on her own? And so much? Did she just quit her job for greener pastures last week? I am tres confused!

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 09:48
    45

    Thanks,Me. I thought it had been awhile.

    If they follow pattern, we will see them pictured in a week or so at Sandringham or elsewhere together. :)

    Coincidence or not,they seem to always answer rumors of “trouble” with a photo op.

    Hang in there peeps, as Rman would say! ;)

  • P
    November 22nd, 2009 09:56
    46

    Some people can’t stand Kate, so if she is with Wills she’s a dependent girl who hasn’t her own friends to go out and can’t breath whitout him at her side, but if she goes out without him (and he without her) it means they are on rocks and will break up soon.
    The question isn’t what is really going on but think and wish they won’t be together forever.
    Some(and I) would call this envy.

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 09:58
    47

    Good Morning,

    Guys these two have gone out without each other before so there’s nothing more to it.

    Ked my friend we are approaching 2010 very fast and yes I do think something will come up next year. The couple has come a long way since their university days and and I think decisions are being made up now.

    It will do a lot of good to finally see where this is going because I think enough games have been played and it’s time to get serious now. Every year we go through these same speculations over and over again so it will be nice to finally get some kind of word from these two.

  • NYme
    November 22nd, 2009 09:59
    48

    Remember that RAFFLES is just in front of the RITZ where william is supposed to have something on saturday night.

    Remember too, on the night where kate wears this splendid grey long dress (charity event), after the event, william joins harry at a club (but no presence of kate). I think she is totally right to avoid those places. And the pictures in the taxi on friday night doesnt mean she went to a club? or maybe an after party organised by Holly Branson after the movie … she was too happy and gorgeous on friday night to suppose there is something wrong between them. I ‘m a married woman, and I organise “sorties” just between girlfriends, and my husband does the same! its very sane

  • really?
    November 22nd, 2009 10:03
    49

    Buck maid tee hee that gave me a giggle. Well espcially because Ked said Will was out of the country. But he doesn’t seem to be now. A deal? I don’t see it unless he is ultimately a cold heartless jerk. He doesn’t know her very well if he thinks she would accept it. Not her modus. No she is not for exposing things. But I would not put it past her mom or James. They are business minded. I would hope she would get her own back with him by letting him destroy himself and his own reputation while she gets on with her life without him if they have broken up. She is out of years of misery if they have split. I trust Tom will come in and marry her now. That would be very Jane Austen if that happened. Where she gets her own back by finding the life she truely wants to lead with a man who will treat her with true respect.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 10:04
    50

    NYTime, the after the premier party was part of the fundraiser. She and friends went to the Orchid where it was held, the price entrance was donated to the said charity that benefited from the premier and after drinks party.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 10:05
    51

    P, I agree and thanks for the Ritz infront of Raffles information, I didn’t know that.

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 10:06
    52

    NYme, you are being far to logical! LOL. Maybe given that William did not have his usual eyes glazed over look he usually has after knocking back a few, he just popped into raffles for a quick hello or a drink. Not a all nighter like usual,LOL.

  • really?
    November 22nd, 2009 10:08
    53

    Raffles is not in front of the Ritz. Raffles is on the King’s Road in Chelsea. The Ritz is down the street from St. James Palace in Mayfair or technically the other side of the street on Mayfair. They are in different parts of the city.

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 10:12
    54

    P,

    There are many people that just wish William & Kate call it all off because they think they have this girl figured out already. I call it judging a book by it’s cover.

    My true feeling is that we have to get a chance to know the girl behind the camera. Once that happen things will change.

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 10:43
    55

    NYme, it’s always a nice thing when the couple have their girls night out and the guys have their night out. Somehow people always think when William & Kate do this there is something wrong with their relationship. I think some tend to forget that William & Kate do normal relationship things.

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 10:46
    56

    I would also like to add that we very often get too wrapped up in speculation.

  • P
    November 22nd, 2009 10:48
    57

    Rman, I find your terms perfect. People use doubt if Wills loves Kate just bc they aren’t a PDA couple but William don’t use to be a PDA person with everbody. I’ve saw many pics and videos of Diana giving him hugs and kisses and he didn’t returned. It means he didn’t love his mother? No way. He is just a reserved person, and Kate also, but unfortunately many don’t respect it.

  • P
    November 22nd, 2009 10:52
    58

    Some people behave as William life should be a show.

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 11:02
    59

    Rman,I agree, Too much speculation over every little thing they do. When the status of their relationship changes one way or another,w e will hear it from reliable sources. Until then, status quo.

  • sojourner
    November 22nd, 2009 11:09
    60

    The question is, where and how did he spend the night? We will not know, however crazy it may drive some. So, as far as we know, or don’t, he still saw KM, or didn’t.

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 11:19
    61

    They were both in London, you do the math. ;)

  • curious
    November 22nd, 2009 12:10
    62

    Raffles is on King’s road and near Old Church street where Kate lives.

    I hope they would attend Royal variety show together. Why not…

  • Lisa
    November 22nd, 2009 12:40
    63

    Maybe they did attend the show together. Afterall we have no pictures of any of them attending the show…

    Do you mean Kate’s old flat? I thought she was not staying there any longer?

  • Lisa A.
    November 22nd, 2009 13:26
    64

    I’m a huge Kate Middleton fan and I absolutely love seeing her fashion! I recreate her looks on shopstyle so if any of you are also fans of her fashion check out the Kate Middleton looks I have posted, it would be great to see more Kate fans on there! :)

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 13:35
    65

    Royal variety is December 7.

    Yes Kate Middleton’s flat is located exactly there. :)

  • NYme
    November 22nd, 2009 13:49
    66

    I just watch again the photos at the movie premier: too much happiness in kate’s smile. No worry. If william was in a break up period, he’ll adopt a more low key profil and even if he goes to club, he’ll wont smile and laugh in the car. just for PR, . This guy is just a happy man, as kate is a happy woman. I could’nt resist to go to the “other site”. The kate haters are so funny and immature, it just laughable now and we can write their post for them, so predictable. I’m pretty sure those girls (some of them) are very young and not in a relationship. They just dont know what it is to be in love. It’s not to be stick to one another. And one say william and kate dont love each other because they do things separately, unlike chelsy and harry. Oh really??? They really do what they want with the truth!! funny teenagers!!!

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 14:07
    67

    I agree NYme.

  • Katharine
    November 22nd, 2009 14:14
    68

    Lol. Good point, NYme… If Kate is with William, she has no life and if she’s alone there must be trouble. Yikes! :)

  • rv
    November 22nd, 2009 15:05
    69

    Miss Jessica Carige just split with her fiancee and she looks happy. So even if Kate and William split, she could handle it better being more mature now.

    Once read that William uses friends London flats, as safe houses to avoid intrusive questions.

  • n02va15
    November 22nd, 2009 15:19
    70

    I still feel like they have split. Kate covering her face, wearing miniskirts (what happened the last time they slit), William seen along, Kate seen alone. Jessica back in the picture?

    Too many “coincidences”

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 15:23
    71

    LOL Katharine.

  • Rman
    November 22nd, 2009 15:33
    72

    Folks there’s no evidence that William & Kate has split. Kate had a girls night out to support a film project and it looks like William had a guys night out. They do that from time to time. It’s just a normal thing to do.

    I just wish people would stop always thinking the worst about this couple. I don’t know why but some always have to so negative about William and Kate’s relationship. I just find that wierd.

  • Clover
    November 22nd, 2009 15:47
    73

    Rman,
    You are right, no evidence exists suggesting that they have split.

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 17:59
    74

    Kate and William have not split. Stop feeding the trolls and they will go back to that awful Kate hate site they have come from.

  • sall
    November 22nd, 2009 18:37
    75

    Guest ,the important question is not whether they have split or not ,the ?? is, are we waiting for an engagement announcement or a split.

    Anyway kate looked very good on her recent outing and I hope she keeps it up.Looking at the way she was dressed (recently and previously) ,and adding up the way she has led her life I think one starts to get a little glimpse of who Kate Middleton is.

  • ked
    November 22nd, 2009 18:38
    76

    Hello,

    Guest, I don’t know if they have split but how do you know they haven’t?

    The one thing to remember is that what you say is personal, we speak for ourselves and for what we think.

    Have they or haven’t they is also personal to them both at this stage . Possible ramifications and recriminations only happen later when the truth is known.

    However I am clear on one matter that indecision and procrastination has been the downfall of families, companies, armies and countries since time immemorial and successful diplomats, politicians and yes , Sovereigns have all been decisive , are reliant on and listerned to such advisors throughout history.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 18:51
    77

    Hopefully everything in the W&K front is good.

    Kate attending one of William’s friends (Olly) documentary with girlfriends, all smiles and looking pretty. And our William with his lonely smile and a bit slyish eyes.

  • ked
    November 22nd, 2009 18:58
    78

    Hello,

    Ladies, may I ask a question ?

    Do you change your hair style or make up when you change boy friends ?

    Or is my wife pulling my leg?

  • Clover
    November 22nd, 2009 19:13
    79

    Ked,
    I do!
    Sometimes it is about getting rid of the styles the ex liked.

    Sometimes it is about wanting to attract a different type of man – this time.

    Sometimes it is about getting the attention of the ex – to show him what he is going to miss!

    I am afraid I am guilty of all three!

  • Katharine
    November 22nd, 2009 19:16
    80

    ^ Yes, Ked…it’s been done. ;)

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 19:40
    81

    You guys crack me up, she’s worn her hair up in different ocassions. And has also used heavy charcol or so light she’s deamed with the ‘natural’ look, which actually she still makes-up.

    http://www.sawf.org/Newsphotos/Entertainment/KateMiddleton03July2007.jpg

    If you wish for more, just ask and I’ll post them.

  • Me
    November 22nd, 2009 19:47
    82

    She started of the premier with her hair tied up and at the club ;) she let her hair down!

    Say what? Normal girls from planet earth with long hair (I do and all the ones I know who have longish hair) carry in our handbag a rubber band (s) (which is a must), to scarves (Queen Elizabeth II when she has bad hair days, to riding, to hunting, to walk abouts), to bandanas, etc.

    Note: Kate usually wears her hair tied up when snow skiing

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 21:28
    83

    Ked, no offense, but your posting style of riddles and cryptic tidbits that never seem to amount to anything are getting old. This couple is still together, until William’s staff confirms differrently, as they did when he and Kate split in 2007. Until then, I will assume, as should other level-headed royal watchers, that Kate and William are together in a happy, comfortable relationship. Despite the band of Kate Haters who come here and stir up lies, aided by long-time posters here who I thought were better than the muckrakers who come here.

    This is about the only royal site where the majority of posters can discuss Kate Middleton rationally, without sounding like green-eyed high-school girls. It is obvious to me that these posters from those awful royal gossip sites are coming here to stir up false info about Kate hoping the lazy tabloid writers will take the bite.

    BRW regulars, ignore these posters.

  • Clover
    November 22nd, 2009 21:37
    84

    Me,
    That photo was taken in 2007. Also, the hairstyle was completely different anyway.
    When Kate engages in active leisure activities, she does pull her hair back – most people do.
    That was a classic ponytail and in this week’s picture is was a upsweep. Besides there are hundreds of pictures of Kate with her hair down.

    We are talking about Kate going to an event with paparazzi and wearing her hair in an upsweep style. This is new for her.

    Guest,
    Speak for yourself! Leave Ked ALONE!

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 21:42
    85

    I’m not bothering Ked, but merely addressing his question to me. Until we have confirmation that William and Kate have split then speculation that they have simply because he has been to a club without her or she has been spotted at an outing without him his ridiculous. And is also being spouted on sites where the majority of posters despise her.

    That GARBAGE is making its way here and I’m here to call it the BS that I know that it is. I’m not picking on anyone. Besides I’m sure Ked can answer for him or herself.

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 21:44
    86

    The haters will not stop with the vicious rumors about this couple until the day they marry….when the marital strife and DIVORCE rumors will begin in full force.

  • Phoebe
    November 22nd, 2009 21:48
    87

    Her hair may be “different” (it’s a ponytail not an upsweep, so no different than she has done before), but her makeup isn’t.

  • Clover
    November 22nd, 2009 21:54
    88

    Phoebe,
    Let us agree to disagree. The ponytail is tied near the nape of the neck and in the new pictures the hair is tied at the very top of the head. For me a different location. It is okay if the hair looks the same in all pictures for you.
    It is really okay! Let is go, it is not such a big issue. Okay?

    Guest,
    None of the posters here are that simplistic in their thinking. IMO, the posters here are far more complex in thier thinking than you view them. I am sorry we see different levels of complexity in what is written. It is okay. Let is go!

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 22:01
    89

    Clover, you can let it go as my original remarks were not addressed to you. I am sure that ked is capable of responding to me without your help. If you don’t like what I say, you can do as I do with your posts: keep scrolling.

  • Phoebe
    November 22nd, 2009 22:03
    90

    I agree with Guest. Ked is bordering on trolldom. And Clover, no one on this board needs a nanny, so give it a rest.

  • atx
    November 22nd, 2009 22:20
    91

    Kate looks fantastic. Blue is such a gorgeous color on her. Very flattering! Nice to see that she’s actually out and about enjoying herself with out Wills linked to her arm. Hopefully the Christmas season will give us a few more pictures. It’s better than another month of “will they/won’t they?”

    Guest, wow! I thought people here were mature enough to at least enjoy different points of view. “Keep scrolling,” that’s pretty rude. At least Clover and others will take all sides in rather than pick and choose their favorites.

  • jj
    November 22nd, 2009 22:21
    92

    Open Letter to PW and KM

    Dear Kate and William please do something soon preferably get engaged so we will all have something nice to be excited about and so a rare single picture or outing doesn’t cause crazy cabin fever.

    I hope I am not asking to much..

    Thank you

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 22:29
    93

    Atx, I had hopes that those same mature enough people are also smart enough to see BS when it’s coming at them.

    If someone’s going to hint around that Kate & William have split up, prove it. Otherwise, they can expect to get called out. I apologize for nothing. This site once again is being invaded, and I will continue to call that out as well.

  • Guest
    November 22nd, 2009 22:45
    94

    JJ, LOL. :-) Cute. :-)

  • mapleleaf
    November 22nd, 2009 22:56
    95

    Bravo Guest! Please continue to call out the trolls and call out those who insist on delivering either wrong information or unnecessarily cryptic comments that don’t amount to a hill of beans.

    Wills and Kate ought to be able to go out separately without the sky falling in or an assumption that they are not together any more being made. They’ve gone out separately this year and they went out separately last year. It’s not a new thing, and it’s not critical.

    The only people who are making something out of it are the people who don’t want Wills and Kate to be together. Those people are anxious to see any sort of sign that their wishes are coming true, so they project their hopes of a break up onto every occurance that happens, hoping and wishing that THIS time, their wishes will come true and it really will be a break up. Those people have been hoping and wishing for a break up ever since Wills and Kate got back together in 2007, and so far they’ve continued to be disappointed, as no break up has happened.

    I’m sure the people hoping for a break up are upset that one has not occurred, so they continue to try to reshape reality by pretending everything that happens is a bad sign, no matter what.

    This is real life, not a television show or a bunch of movie sequels. And in real life, even the most loving couples go out without each other occasionally. If Wills and Kate were going out without each other even 2 times a month every single month, then it would look like there was a problem between them. But that isn’t happening. Both of them are rarely seen out and about, Kate even more rarely than Wills. They’ve both been out with each other (but not clubbing) this year and they’ve been out without each other this year.

    It is illogical and silly to assume that a couple is broken up just because they went out without each other, unless they’re going out like that on a regular basis, which Wills and Kate have not done. Therefore, what is all the ‘hoopla’ about?

    It’s the people who don’t want to see Wills and Kate together who are stirring up the most comments and controversy.

    IMO, P, Guest, Lisa, Phoebe, NYme, Me, and Rman are all correct.

  • really?
    November 22nd, 2009 23:12
    96

    Ok is someone posting for ked? I now think the 1 M comment was a joke and if I didn’t know any better I would guess Ked was James Middleton _ pulling everyones leg including kates! For what it is worth someone who.knows them has told me that the original break up was Kates doing afterall. She pulled the plug on him for the flirting bit as she has many times before. Only that time it was over and she walked away. What ensued was months of PW desperate to have her back and her only agreeing much later than everyone thinks. The story is that she is going to New York but for a very short time in the new year – about 4 weeks. Where she will make her decision as to whether she is up to the job or not. And contrary to my beleifs She has NO interest in TVS. Apparently William is absolutely lost with out her. She provides him with a grounding he cannot get from royal life or family. They are tiffing right now but it is only a tiff nothing serious. Kate has said that she needs time to figure out if she can do the role. William is no where near ready to marry but soon after NYC she figures she will either bow out for good or they will agree and plan marry in 2011. Oh and the royal who doesn’t like Kate? It is Camilla – perhaps afraid that the public will go back to Camilla hating days with the young ‘ethereal’ beauty permanently in their midst. The Queen has met her and likes her.

  • dagsi
    November 22nd, 2009 23:22
    97

    thanks, mapleleaf… you always remind me why we shouldn’t read too deeply into every single little thing that comes out of the W/K news drought…

    I also don’t see why this should mean breakup at all… and I won’t until I see many more regular occurrences of them going out separately; or if the media confirms it; or if either is seen with someone else.

    Because even if they’ve been out separately this week, we can’t say they haven’t seen each other at all. There’s no way to prove it. Besides,
    (1) Why is Kate in London this weekend? Twitter says so. Doesn’t she normally spend weekends in the country unless Wills is in town?
    (2) Kate attended a premiere of Wills’ good friend. Shows she’s still tight with the royal crowd.

  • Jj
    November 22nd, 2009 23:27
    98

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royals/2741357/Prince-William-leaves-club-in-a-bodywarmer.html

  • atx
    November 23rd, 2009 00:03
    99

    Has anyone ever considered that the reason nobody can convince people in the middle of one way or another when it comes to Kate is simply because one side just seems too fanatical about Kate and the other side is just overly vicious towards her? Some one doesn’t agree?!? Grab the six-shooter and a lynchin’ rope!!! More name calling? Really? LOL!

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 00:43
    100

    Oh my,LOL…I hate when I miss out on the fun…

    ked,dear, you think too much. And your stirring the pot. Naughty boy!

    Guest {{ hugs }} :)

    Nyme …SPOT ON!

    mapleleaf…as usual I bow to your eloquence and logic.

    :)

  • rv
    November 23rd, 2009 00:53
    101

    william kate will marry or
    william kate will break up

    it will be one or other

    both possible so

    chill down ok
    luv for every1

    ** BRW – pick a username and stick to it please… **

  • royals at work
    November 23rd, 2009 01:21
    102

    http://www.google.com/translate?u=svenskdam.se/2009/11/bildspel-kunglig-middag-i-berwaldhallen/&sl=sv&tl=en

    No one from the british royal family, why…

  • meg
    November 23rd, 2009 01:35
    103

    Well, Mapleleaf this time you’re not totally right.. I am one of those who have a problem believing in this relationship right now. And I have always wated the two to be together. For life. But the way they behave now worries me a lot and I’m not able to fool myself much longer. Yes, they have gone out seperately before. Many times. And why would you do that when you don’t see eachother through the week? Why don’t they want to spend their free time together?? Yes, a lot of people do things seperately, but they spend more time together than apart. Kate and Will spend very little time together, so why seperate lives when they can be together?? Not normal for a couple in love, in my opinion. Believe me, I wish I’m wrong, but how can I possibly see any future for this couple who don’t want to spenf time together?.

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 01:51
    104

    Good Night My Royal Peeps,

    I was only gone for a couple of hours and you guys are already at each others throats. Our friend Ked is known to shake things up a bit so there’s nothing new there.

    From what I can tell is that William & Kate are doing just fine but just spent a night out without each other, it don’t mean that they are not in contact with one another or going back home to each other. They are doing what many couples do and that’s having your own night out. It’s very healthy for every relationship. I remember we were at this same page when William went out to a club before he and Harry went to Africa for the charity bike ride. Kate did not accompany William to the club and all hell broke loose on the royal forums. Still everything was okay on the William & Kate front.

    We just have to learn to keep calm even when things look a bit funny and lets not be too quick to jump to conclusions. I think we get this way because this couple are total pros at keeping us all on our toes and on the edge of our seats. They give us smiles, polo outings, clubbing nights, vacations, hunting sessions, society wedding pics, and sometimes even royal family events and still they don’t say so much as a syllable about one another. That is what keep us guessing and the media speculating.

    You guys may disagree with me on this but one thing I can tell is that William & Kate are in love with each other and they do whatever it takes to keep the love going despite the worlds eyes on them. That tells me that this couple will make it. They will hit a few bumps in the road but as long as they keep walking hand in hand through the fire they will make it.

    atx, I think that happens because Kate is judged so unfairly on so many levels by some people. She gives no reason for people to be so nasty towards her and that really bothers many of us. But I now realize that this will continue to happen until this girl speak for the first time and begin to show us that there’s more to her than just being the pretty royal girlfriend in the background. Things are going to change once people get to know her better. Not everyone will like her even then but people will have a better understanding of Kate Middleton. That royal engagement is the key to a new beginning.

    Now only if we can get that key!

  • NYme
    November 23rd, 2009 01:54
    105

    Meg,

    Sorry but the “entrainement” at the RAF has been cancelled due to dangerous wether conditions. So william was back to london before saturday. So how can you say “why would you do that when you don’t see eachother through the week?” you ask the question and anwser it yourself. We dont know if they spend friday and saturday together or not.
    “Why don’t they want to spend their free time together??” Really they dont want??? how can we say that? I’m pretty sure they spend more time together than apart when william is not at the base. We all know for a long time kate and william wont go any more together clubbing. More photos paparazzi when they are together and more bad press. When william is alone, just a short article in the sun (this morning) without compromised comments from the newspaper and nothing in the daily mail. That’s the point!!! not to feed the papers. It will be counterproductive for kate to go clubbing with william and face the paparazzi regarding the arrangement made by her lawyers concerning the press. She just cant!! when she goes with girlfriends (if this is really the case) we have no pics and no prooves. So she plays it very softly. We will not have any more photos of kate and william together out of a club, never more. This week end I had a party for a friend who’is going to marry in two weeks. My husband was not invited it was a girl affair (dont know the name in english : enterrement de vie de jeune fille). And tomorrow I go to the basket because I do sport, and on saturday afternoon my husband play tennis with his mates, we love each other very much and are married for 12 years.

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 02:19
    106

    meg, I do see where you are coming from but just because we don’t see them together all the time does not mean they are not together in their private time. We have to remember that this couple have a private life too. Their togetherness will not always be for public viewing. We have to get use to them not always being together because that’s how it’s going to be even when they get married. They will end up doing separate engagements just like other members of the royal family. They are not going to be like gum stuck to each others shoes. Every couple need their breathing space.

  • wonder
    November 23rd, 2009 02:47
    107

    everyone is entitled to their opinion!

    at the premiere, KM wore her hair in a different “going out” hair style; and, she wore considerably more eye makeup than usual; she was clearly wearing dark eyeliner on both upper and lower eyelids. the difference was noticeable.

    the pictures reminded me of her 2007 breakup, when she made a point of flashing a beaming smile to the cameras and wearing her skirts considerably shorter. in 2007, she was making a concerted effort to look unfazed by the breakup and “happy to be free”

    sure, maybe this recent outing was just girls night out. but there has been a string of coincidences, starting with her rather crestfallen facial expressions at LHR, and trying to shield herself from the cameras

    i don’t think it’s envy at all that drives posters to question where things are headed.

    it’s rather the reality that, after these many years, there is not yet even an engagement, let alone a marriage

    maybe PW already popped the question back in 2008 (or was it late 2007?) and was declined, back when *he* was looking so crestallen

    more likely he hasn’t yet, and KM is still in limbo land

    when posters say they’ll marry in 2011 or 2012 or even later, well, that seems cruel! the reality, i think, is that PW has not yet made a firm emotional commitment to KM, in his own mind. He’s still not sure. If he were sure, I believe that out of love and consideration of his beloved, he’d have proposed already.

  • NYme
    November 23rd, 2009 03:04
    108

    hum, maybe I do a ponytail this morning (not very usual for me) … My husband must absolutely become anxious and worry, if not I’m going to explain to him he has to because I change my hair style. And maybe I put more eyeliner… oh la la, divorce is coming quick (poor husband)

    I wonder if wonder is not n02va15??? Same typing and wording… there has been a string of coincidences

  • wonder
    November 23rd, 2009 03:07
    109

    ps:

    there are people who study blogs like this for a living

    they study the kinds of interactions posters have with one another in their posts, and look at the emotional content of the posts; etc.

    i’m simplifying things greatly, but on many blogs, people post back and forth in a fairly civil and mature manner, mainly focusing on aspects of the issues under discussion; this blog used to be that kind of blog. it used to accomodate more nuance and display more sophistication.

    on other kinds of blogs, posters become fairly emotional; they may approach issues in a very non-nuanced way, and insist on a single “groupthink” viewpoint regarding an issue; they may not be able to tolerate any disagreement or divergence of opinion; they may also gang up on one poster or another, and form coalitions; or they may condemn any posters who express any dissenting views; or they may publicly choose sides, as school children might do in the schoolyard during childish squabbles.

    hope this blog isn’t falling into that second category

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 03:12
    110

    The truth is we just don’t know what’s going to happen next. We all are waiting, the wait can be fun a bit but I’m getting pretty tired. I really do think after all this time the wait is what making people very cranky.

    Good Night.

  • wonder
    November 23rd, 2009 03:44
    111

    That’s exactly right.

    Posters here are in limbo land.

    We are all waiting, and getting pretty tired. And cranky.

    We wait, get our hopes up, have then dashed; wait some more; get hopes up, have them dashed; rinse and repeat; year after year. Christmas, Birthday, New Year’s, Valentine’s, Summer; then it starts all over again.

    As bad as the wait and the not knowing is for posters, at least our lives and our futures don’t actually depend on the outcome.

  • mapleleaf
    November 23rd, 2009 03:47
    112

    Rman, I hope you sleep well and have a restful night. dagsi and Lisa, thank you both for the tremendous compliments.

    I’m always encouraged and enlightened by comments from both of you.

  • bluefire
    November 23rd, 2009 04:57
    113

    i think we will have to wait im pretty tired of speculation around the couple a lot of been said in them let hope that next year they will announce their engagements

  • NYme
    November 23rd, 2009 05:29
    114

    An article in the Telegraph today to read :

    “Prince William and Prince Harry: A firm foundation for the brothers in arms ;
    Prince William and Prince Harry are rising to the challenge of royal life together”, says Andrew Pierce.

    Have a good day.

    This royal site is far the best place to chat (sorry wonder for my previous post. dont want to have fun of you. You are right, we have to behave well between us)

  • Chris
    November 23rd, 2009 08:13
    115

    Oh dear.
    Just a few pics from a WE – and some people are at others’ throat. At least Kate and William seem to have had a good night out.
    Ked, your riddle was good fun. I still do not think that you know anything more than the rest of us, but you try to entertain us and I appreciate that. NYme *hug*.
    Some people read far too much into these snapshots. Even the happiest couple cannot look deliriously happy into each others eyes all the time. And Kate is allowed to try new hairstyles – in fact, I and many other people will appreciate it. I mean, are we really trying to judge the state of their relationship from a hairstyle??? What happened to Tarot and crystal balls and pendulums? Hmm???
    The coming WE, I will get new highlights. Poor husband. :-)

  • Chris
    November 23rd, 2009 08:18
    116

    Oh, just for the record:
    Kate looked lovely. But I must admit, I did not like her handbag. Nobody mentioned her handbag yet, so I thought I do that now. :-)

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 08:21
    117

    WOW, Really? (poster) very interesting your post!

    Quote
    Ok is someone posting for ked? I now think the 1 M comment was a joke and if I didn’t know any better I would guess Ked was James Middleton _ pulling everyones leg including kates! For what it is worth someone who.knows them has told me that the original break up was Kates doing afterall. She pulled the plug on him for the flirting bit as she has many times before. Only that time it was over and she walked away. What ensued was months of PW desperate to have her back and her only agreeing much later than everyone thinks. The story is that she is going to New York but for a very short time in the new year – about 4 weeks. Where she will make her decision as to whether she is up to the job or not. And contrary to my beleifs She has NO interest in TVS. Apparently William is absolutely lost with out her. She provides him with a grounding he cannot get from royal life or family. They are tiffing right now but it is only a tiff nothing serious. Kate has said that she needs time to figure out if she can do the role. William is no where near ready to marry but soon after NYC she figures she will either bow out for good or they will agree and plan marry in 2011. Oh and the royal who doesn’t like Kate? It is Camilla – perhaps afraid that the public will go back to Camilla hating days with the young ‘ethereal’ beauty permanently in their midst. The Queen has met her and likes her.
    Unquote

    I always had the feeling it was and is Kate who is the one who literally ‘rules the roost’.

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 08:32
    118

    Good morning,

    Me, where did the above post come from? Are people going crazy or is it just me? LOL “Today” here in the US just had a spot on Will and kate. I missed it as I was on the phone with work but I am sure the internet site will have it up soon. If I am able,I will link to it.

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 08:35
    119

    The new issue of Hello!

    http://www.hellomagazine.com/

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 08:56
    120

    Post from really? (poster) at reply no. 96

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 09:06
    121

    Today footage is up

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/

    scroll down to the video section.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 09:15
    122

    I think everyone should be able to express their opinions staying on target (article or the BRF in discussion) without bashing a/the poster. We all in some way or another criticise, play the guessing game (positive or negative) and speculate. No one has the absolute truth.

    What is so difficult in agreeing to disagree with others or similar point of view? or have tolerance?

    As an old member, Steve has edited, deleted posts thay may well be rude bordering on defamation and/or libel. So people chill out.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 09:19
    123

    What I meant to say was “Me, As an old member here, Steve has…”

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 09:26
    124

    Agreed,me. I think there are definitely some games being played right now between sites with poster posting false info to rile other up etc, which is why I am trying to stay out of it for the most part and stick to posting links and factual stuff. All these posts floating around with “inside” information or information that would obviously have to come from someone very close to the couple is just not believable to me. I fail to see how anyone close to William or Kate would be wasting their time posting their personal business on a blog site. JMO.

    I am waiting it out so to speak. I found the “today” video interesting.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 09:28
    125

    Thank Lisa, and I will be checking at lunch break the video. Can’t wait!

    :lol:

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 10:51
    126

    Good Morning All,

    Mapleleaf I did have a wonderful sleep.

    I know we are getting tired of this but we just have to wait and see what’s going to happen. I do think something is in the works and I hope we will some evidence next year.

    The people we are waiting on is William & Kate and they have yet to tell us anything. We need to hear from them. The Palace can plan all they want but it’s the couple that has to set things in stone. I think because they have put this high guarded wall up since they left university, it’s what got everyone including the media guessing on which year the wedding will take place. The media is busy linking the wedding to the Diamond Jubilee celebrations but in reality they really don’t know when it’s going to happen. We have yet to hear from the couple and the members of the media are already going out to buy their suits and dresses for a 2012 wedding.

    What we need is the engagement announcement and then everything can kick off. With the Queen going to Canada in 2010 and William going on a official trip to down under in 2010, that lets me know that an election is not ruining the royals plans so I’m hoping that something will be made by next year.

  • really?
    November 23rd, 2009 11:01
    127

    I don’t claim my information is correct just what I heard from people that know them.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 11:16
    128

    And nothing wrong with that really? Everyone has the right to post whatever within BRW inhouse rules!

    What I highly disagree is in bashing a poster. If said poster has said anything rude and bordering on defamation or libel, sure enough Steve has in the past edited and deleted.

    So I don’t get the hype (boil, cool off or whatever) if Ked or anyone wishes to keep on writing encrypted, riddle, phrases, up hair, down hair, she just discovered or not the moon postings.

  • curious
    November 23rd, 2009 11:32
    129

    So, Kate showed up in public because Hello needed a cover, i am more interested in Anne’s interview (experience you know)

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 11:36
    130

    Ok, guys I was able to download the digital version of Hello! There is nothing really new in the mag but it is a good edition with not only the Kate story but a good story with nice pictures of Princess Anne as well as an article about the Queen opening Parliament.

  • LadyB
    November 23rd, 2009 11:37
    131

    Hello everyone! As you may realise, I am fairly new to posting on this site altho I do run round all the royal sites for news/pictures. I prefer to post here as everyone always seems so positive, not just re Kate and Will but show a positive attitude to each other’s opinions.

    If what poster Really has to say is true, well, we shall all find out pretty soon! As I’ve said before, I view a little trip for Kate as something else that’s positive. Sometimes to gain a bit of perspective, it’s a good thing to get away for a bit. I shall be doing the same thing myself in just a few days for a few weeks.

    All the constant speculation must really take a toll after a while. In any case, if Kate does go abroad for a while, what does it prove? It proves she’s thinking! Well, good for her. I’m pleased so far that they have not rushed into anything.

    The right wedding at the right time, folks.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 12:20
    132

    That’s 2 persons with similar Kate stories (one was given to me in private).

    We’ve had stories here from someone who went to Mustique and met W&K.
    A French sister of a worker who was hired (the entire catering company) to Highgrove last years PC birthday detailing the Kate and Chelsy actions/reactions with the invites and what they where wearing, and how they acted. Many believed her because of coincidential behaviour, one going from table to table the other clinging to her redhead?! And why believe? Because one has lived her entire life in the UK, while the other not and hasn’t been much in the fold like the one.
    An Elizabeth also came here claiming to know and gave lots of inside interesting information.
    Our Redlady neighbour of the area (KM parents house in Berks) and so on.

    Believing it or not is upto each person. Let’s be respectful. We all have cherry picked and yes I also try hard not to crack up (laughter or cry in disbelief) with posts like of Karagiosis!

    So what is seen or perhaps portrayed in the outside by the press may be different from the inside.

    IMO, W&K will sooner or later marry.

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 12:37
    133

    Hello LadyB,

    We welcome you to this site and look forward to reading more of your posts.

    I’m not really sure about this New York trip because Richard Palmer did mention that the New York rumor is not true even though the press was printing that story. If she goes to New York that would be fine but I’m not sure if it’s true. Sometimes the false rumors travel for awhile.

    Lisa, Clover or Mapleleaf I would like to see a scan of the Hello! articles on Kate and Anne. If you guys could scan if for me I would really appreciate it.

    I just think the media is speculating and waiting just like us all.

    I hope William & Kate keep strong and not let the speculations ruin what they have together. You can try to continue to ignore the press but like you said LadyB it can take it’s toll. This couple has come a long way from their university days and I’m sure their love had deepened since that time.

    People can say what they want about Kate but I think she has handled the stress of this long courtship pretty well and that is one of the reasons why we are so interested in her. I know on the other royal forums, YouTube and even the tabloid sites people have become pros at ripping her apart about every little thing but they have failed to realize that after all the stuff they put this girl through (on the internet) she has remained strong, continues to smile and she is till with her prince. That should put things into perspective for them and I think it does but they just have a hard time admitting it.

    I continue to pray for this couple because I think they deserve it.

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 12:46
    134

    Rman buddy,I am so sorry but I do not have a scanner. For less then 4USD you can purchase the digital version of Hello! Just go to the main page of the website and click on “digital version” in the upper right hand corner. It is instant and they save your mags in a library so you can always have them. Good luck!

  • ked
    November 23rd, 2009 13:17
    135

    Hello,

    Anyone read today’s Telegraph ?

    PW (and PH) are going to have very little time for themselves or friends over the next decade.

    It would be interesting to know how PW or his suits explained this to KM and to hear or see her reaction.

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 13:32
    136

    Come on ked, lets not go there again.Remember how little time William was going to have for Kate once he was in the SAR training program and was posted to far away lands?

    Somehow I think they will manage. ;)

    Or maybe William and Harry could decide to be celibate for the next decade? No? LOL.

  • sarcastic
    November 23rd, 2009 13:34
    137

    definitely PW will manage but Kate i doubt it…btw, bit of stretch to say the suits have to explained their actions or plans to Kate when it doesnt concern her at all, lol…

  • Lisa
    November 23rd, 2009 13:36
    138

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz………

  • kd
    November 23rd, 2009 13:38
    139

    Really – that was a very interesting post. I do think that KM wears the pants in that relationship so to say. I feel people have KM pegged all wrong. I think she is a very strong, loyal and kind person with a good head on her shoulders. I do not believe however that they would marry the same year as the Queen jubilee and Olympics. I feel it will happen sooner and I agree w/the Today show report – their engagement will be very short. I do not believe any of the posts that PW & KM are splitsville.

  • sarcastic
    November 23rd, 2009 13:39
    140

    Kate wears the pants, lol..If she was, she would have been married by now, lol

    to Lisa, what a respectful poster.. if you dont like, then keep your peace…

  • mj
    November 23rd, 2009 13:52
    141

    yes what is she to do attent all those events with pw and ph meet and greet all those dignitaries, politicians, celebs, socialites and royals supporting the foundation. somehow she will manage :)

  • Clover
    November 23rd, 2009 14:03
    142

    Rman,
    This will have to do for now! It is a good Hello! cover, Kate looks nice!

    http://www.hellomagazine.com/magazine/cover-hello-1100.html

  • Clover
    November 23rd, 2009 14:07
    143

    Here is video of the Today Show talking about an engagement between PW and KM.

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34105442#34105442

  • Clover
    November 23rd, 2009 14:22
    144

    I apologize for posting the Hello! and Today video!

    Thanks to all of those who support the expression of diverse opinions on this blog!

    atx: Thanks!
    meg: Thanks!
    rman: I agree let’s keep our cool!
    wonder: A few very good posts! I think when posters start creating lists of posters THEY THINK are correct, again “think are correct” we very much resemble category #2 in your post #109. Let’s not go there folks!
    Me: Thanks!

    Let us try to see the value of each and every poster. Everyone is unique and has something special to offer.

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 14:48
    145

    sarcastic, I think when people say that she wears the pants in the relationship I don’t think they mean that she bosses him around and goes on to demand a marriage. People think that whatever William tell her to do she will do but this girl don’t look like she can be pushed around by anyone, including William. I’m sure William don’t mistreat her in anyway.

    This girl would not have made it this far if she wasn’t a strong woman. I know on the other forums they like to dub Kate as a weak girl that has no control over her relationship and where it’s going but I think there’s more to this girl and she don’t let anyone just walk all over her. I also don’t think everything is completely on William’s terms. When you are in a long-term relationship like this you talk things through and you make decisions together. I’m with you Kd, they got this girl all wrong.

    Ked, William & Harry will go on to do great things together because they are the future of the Monarchy. They will collaborate on many charities together and try to make a difference and once William & Kate marry she will join them. She will be William’s support and help the young royals turn the Monarchy around. She will be a part of this Ked, just wait until the announcement comes. They are not leaving this girl on the side of the road for a decade. We are hearing a lot about William & Harry’s joint charity ventures but once the engagement comes we will be hearing about William, Kate and Harry’s future roles for the Monarchy.

    Talk to you all later.

  • Chris
    November 23rd, 2009 15:10
    146

    Lets be reasonable here. I do believe that KM is a self confident young lady. However, I somehow doubt that she really needs time to (quote) think it through if she can fill the role (unquote). Come on ! Its been 7 years or so now. Perhaps she had second thoughts the first months or so – because then everybody in a new relationship is trying to figure out if it works or not. But I am very certain that by now, after 7 years or so, Kate knows what she wants. I think she has genuine feelings for him and she is determined.
    Also, the ‘William is lost without her’ story seems a bit exaggerated. That he is happier with than without her – that is probably true. I still think that it is not only William that postpones any official engagement. I think it is also the palace – they want to build up William and Harry before they both get married.

    JMO – my guess is he proposed in private already – he would not leave her hanging in limbo. The Queen and Philip were engaged for a long time until it became official – so it has happened before.
    And as for Camilla – I think she is okay with Kate. I understand that she is rather grounded, this is why Charles loves her so much. She will not make the mistake and play for the press (or anybody else) the ‘evil’ mother in law – because she and everybody else knows she could only loose this ‘war’. I understand she has a good relationship with both William and Harry. And lets be reasonable here – with the history of Charles – William and Harry will be allowed to marry whomever they want. I am certain that Charles (and Camilla) will not let the young men go through what they had to go through.
    JMO, of course.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 15:21
    147

    http://www.tpgnews.com/video/detail.php?id=77844

    William hands clasped all the way to the waiting car.

  • Chris
    November 23rd, 2009 15:43
    148

    Also, one of Camillas qualities: she does not mind to play the supportive role. She is known to be very supportive of Charles, she makes him feel relaxed.
    There is no reason why this would be any different if Kate becomes part of the RF.

  • kd
    November 23rd, 2009 15:55
    149

    I just want to say how great it is that PW & PH are so close. I think that has a lot to do w/how Diana raised them. They seem to be real friends, not just siblings and they really need each others support in their world.

  • ked
    November 23rd, 2009 16:07
    150

    Hello,

    Me check out the blond ???

  • sall
    November 23rd, 2009 16:13
    151

    PW and KM are in love and will marry and don`t you dare think,hint,”puzzle”,question,wonder ,speculate or write otherwise.

  • Phoebe
    November 23rd, 2009 16:24
    152

    There is no blond.

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 16:36
    153

    Seems to be a random short blond middle age lady and her partner leaving Raffles before Prince William and protection officer.

  • Chris
    November 23rd, 2009 17:25
    154

    That blonde middle aged lady seems to get into the car, too. Car-sharing perhaps? ;-)

  • Me
    November 23rd, 2009 18:27
    155

    Hard to see, frozen – pause – seems alone. Perhaps its Auntie Spencer.

  • Rman
    November 23rd, 2009 19:27
    156

    Good Evening,

    The only people that was in William’s car was his protection squad.

  • really?
    November 23rd, 2009 23:13
    157

    Crikey! The Chav? Please Ked you are cracking me up!!!! The best was the 1 million pound pay off! Not much when the advance on the book could be 5 times that AND her family would have that already. Please keep em coming the comedy hour is keeping me going tonight.

  • really?
    November 23rd, 2009 23:17
    158

    The think it through part from what I understand is to get away from everything to a place where she can think it through alone. She has been with her family for sometime. Again just what I heard.

  • kat
    November 24th, 2009 06:29
    159

    Of the interview, I thought that the most interesting part was the fact that the wedding of Willliam and Kate would probably happen two months after the engagement announcement. If that is the case, they could get married at any time. I am hoping that they don’t wait until 2012. As someone who is routing for william and Kate I hope it is sooner than later. For them, I hope that they will be very happpy together whenever they get married.

  • bluefire
    November 24th, 2009 08:24
    160

    i think that i will wait the time for wedding i really want to buy hello magazine

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 08:57
    161

    Well yes, really?, I believe Kate has the harder part to accept or not, she wasn’t born into it, she has choices she may take. Any other UK citizen retires at the corresponding age and does whatever they want to do. If she accepts, it will be married to the BRF and work forever until death. She has enjoyed the girlfriend status and every year that goes by there is pressure to both, but more goes her way.

    As many have said that Prince William cannot get it wrong (divorcing like his father, uncle Andy and auntie Anne), I also put my feet in Kate’s shoes and all the what ifs of being married to the baggage that the Monarchy and its rules represent.

  • Lisa
    November 24th, 2009 09:26
    162

    Good morning guys,

    Me, I hear what you are saying but I really think Kate would have had to have thought this thing over long before now. They could have gone their seperate ways in 2007 but didn’t. Kate knows the deal and has accepted it,I believe. I don’t think either Kate or William, knowing full well his duty to marry and produce an heir, would have gone this far if there was no future or if that future was in question. We just have to wait til they announce their plans and all will be revealed. :)

  • Clover
    November 24th, 2009 09:53
    163

    Lisa,
    I agree. Kate knows full well what she is getting into and has consented to this lifestyle in many ways by staying with PW.

    I really do hate the edding speculation, PW and KM are not officially engaged yet and it seems like the media is imposing its wishes and desires onto these two young people!

  • Lisa
    November 24th, 2009 10:02
    164

    Kate most definitely consented to the lifestyle by staying with William. No worries there. I believe all this speculation has gotten waay out of hand. People need to just leave these two alone and let them live their life. When they have something to tell,we will hear about it. I really hate to see what would happen if they decide to put off marriage for a few years, which is possible. They live in a fishbowl now but that fishbowl gets a whole lot smaller once they day “I do”. I sometimes feel really bad for them in that sense.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 10:52
    165

    Rumours are hot and before Christmas season. Since there is hardly to no news in the Royal front. I guess it won’t hurt more engagement gossip.

    Here it goes:
    Quote
    Rumors are recirculating around Britain that Prince William will finally be marrying Kate Middleton in 2012. The Daily Mail reports that Prince William has long talked of marrying when he turns 30. And that will be in 2012. The couple have already been together on and off for nearly seven years,so it would make a 10 year courtship. With Queen’s Diamond Jubilee, celebrating sixty years on the throne, but hosting the Olympics in London, 2012 it could be the perfect Trifecta. But some see the timing of a 2012, big wedding as perhaps an unwanted distraction to those other events. I think in general any planned marriage real or imagined that is scheduled almost 3 years out is no sure bet.
    Unquote

    REPLY
    Quote
    Dates are wrong. They are trying to deflect attention. The date is May 2010. Third week. She signed a prenup three weeks ago. I saw the paper. It will leak soon. Too many already know.
    Unquote

    What do you guys think? Will it happen? An announcement in Jan, Feb 2010? short notice and wedding in May 2010?

    Have fun.

  • Lisa
    November 24th, 2009 10:54
    166

    oy.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 10:56
    167

    :LOL: Rofl!!! Lisa that was the best opinion I’ve read in the BRW.

  • Lisa
    November 24th, 2009 11:02
    168

    Hmmm…ked did say she met with William’s “suits” and was not happy about what they said or something like that…Maybe the “prenup” process was sticky? (I don’t believe any of this,LOL)

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 11:17
    169

    If any of Wills and Kate’s friends read this, just want you guys to know, I’m a fan!

  • kd
    November 24th, 2009 11:30
    170

    Wow Me – very exciting news. Yes, I do not believe 2012 at all. I think if it is going to happen it will happen either 2010 or 2011. CAN”T WAIT!!!!!!!

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 11:40
    171

    Three weeks ago was when she was photographed at Heathrow returning from who knows where.

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 11:53
    172

    BTW, I found the above comment (by chance) and I think it’s a joke.

  • really?
    November 24th, 2009 11:57
    173

    I think someone very close to kate reads this site and that is all I will say about the matter. I would say that she didn’t sign it if that is what it was and where was her lawyer? Her mother? My feeling is most definitely the engagement will be two months with them, people would go nuts with another waiting period and the hate would mount. Again this is what I have heard I know something critical is to happen but not yet. By critical I mean decisions but that is not until at least 4-5 months after January. Kate has had a long time to get use to being Williams girlfriend. William has pushed back on marriage for a long time because he beleived it would hem him into everything. He is figuring out a way to stay away from the Royal Life as much as possible because that is when he feels he has no longer has choice. This has nothing to do with kate as she is ok with the way things are right now and has a tendancy to wait things out (pardon the expression) I don’t think she is the type to think things through until they are a reality , not an insult but just the way she is.

  • Rman
    November 24th, 2009 12:19
    174

    Good Morning My Royal Peeps,

    All the speculations just lets us know that we really don’t know when it’s going to happen. My guess it that something will happen between 2010/2011 but that’s just my guess and I hope I’m lucky. We just have to wait until Buckingham Palace, St. James’s Palace or Clarence House give us the word.

    I just can’t wait to watch the announcement coverage on the BBC, Sky News and CNN.

  • sall
    November 24th, 2009 12:25
    175

    Really, is your friend a really good friend of KM or her family?
    The spin about how PW is lost without KM leaves one gaping in astonishment.In reality how many areas of PW´s life can KM influence?Career,investments,choice of place of residence,day to day activities…!!!?This is a man who has people to run every aspect of his life.KM`s claim is to say the least absurd.Unless of course she means the services she as a young woman can provide him.
    I also find it hard to believe that after more than 5 years in this relationship,she will need time to think whether she is ready for the job or not,and especially a job which has not been offered yet.( How funny this sounds:KM is going to NY to think about a marriage ,the proposal of which has not been offered because the prince is not ready,and when he gets ready, then they will marry in 2011.)IMO if kate is going to NY it is because she starting to realise that this marriage may not happen and she is exploring other prospects for her life .If she finds something she will stay there,if not she will come back and continue to see PW when he has free.
    I personally do not belive PW is anywhere near marrying anybody(not in his 20s) and this is known and supported by his family.And at the same time I do not think he will break it off with Kate.If he does not want to marry her ,i believe he will drag it out ,see her only occassionally to keep people guessing,with only KM and family knowing how undedicated he is(basically putting KM in the position of having to walk away and at the same time avoid being called a cad).

  • LadyB
    November 24th, 2009 12:30
    176

    Me, I don’t know where you got that from but I can say that a wedding or even an announcement this side of June next year is completely out of the question.

    There is going to be an election in this country at around about that time and it is against the constitution for the royal family to pre-empt that at any point.

    Forget a wedding or engagement at least until the election has taken place, I am absolutely sure that is a given.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 12:35
    177

    The only thing Sall I can say as a Broadsheet/Tabloid fact (because from the media is where we get the food) is that Kate Middleton convinced Prince William to not quit University. That doesn’t mean he is lost without her, but that’s a tidbit of ’she may be his balance’ to good decisions, reality…

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 12:39
    178

    Lady B I agree. I did mention gossip for fun.

  • Rman
    November 24th, 2009 12:41
    179

    If a wedding is due next year, the royal team will have lots of time on their hands during the election to put a wedding together. It can take place after the elections because the royals can go on about their business once the government is settled. The Queen is going to Canada next year. If one is scheduled to happen an announcement can be made early within the year. Folks we just have to wait and see because we are already talking about a wedding without an announcement.

    Although talking about it is fun and I like that it brings lots of joy to the BRW site.

  • Rman
    November 24th, 2009 12:48
    180

    Me I have always believed that she helped encourage him to continue on with his training. Many think she didn’t know about it but that girl knew. She must want him to be the best prepared Prince of Wales/King he can be.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 12:57
    181

    Let’s see what happens, the rumours are so hot that someone said the media in the US is going bananas too! :lol:

    I hope some people don’t get mad with the links (articles, blogs and tweets) I post; they may range from positive, to negative, to the endless engagments rumours, to the same old same old stuff.

    I do remember Uncle GG also said something ‘perhaps not so crazy’ resembling the above quotes I posted here.

    I also do remember a supposed member of the RT whom is friends of Guy Pelly said something very similar.

    Again this is gossip for fun to chat with you guys, since there is non royal news around. Except the QEII and PP are travelling and thanks for that information Rman, I did read it yesterday.

    Note to Steve: love the anti-spam words you change from time to time, I got a berry.

  • kd
    November 24th, 2009 13:25
    182

    I think KM is extremely influential in PW’s life. I think she keeps him grounded and is probably one of the very few who is completely honest 100% w/him even when he doesn’ want to hear the truth. I think she may even guide him the way Diana did – remember both women came from the real world, not the BRF.

  • Clover
    November 24th, 2009 13:34
    183

    I wish I knew what newspapers you guys are reading. I have NEVER read anything that gave me that much personal detail, discussed the inner workings and dynamics of the relationship between PW and KM.

    You guys are like “Kate kept him from taking that promotion and wiped his tears on Tuesday night, and fights for him to see the reality in situations…” etc. LOL!

    You guys are funny! :)

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 13:37
    184

    Hahaha the things ‘one’ read in the worldwide web is a crack up to laugh, cry.

    From misinterpretations of posters of Richard Kay when saying “People think Kate Middleton is a decoy” to poster interpetation that Richard Kay said “Kate Middleton is a decoy”.

    Antispam word: pear (Cute)

  • sall
    November 24th, 2009 14:33
    185

    Me,you are right.When in college I can see how KM could have been his balance.Today ? doubtful.I mean even their friends are first and foremost his friends.

    Anyway I like your sense of fun about all this engagement rumours .I at first took them seriously but after waiting in vain and doing some investigation ,I have come to conclude this is just talk/writing to sell newspapers,books ,for I have not read,seen,heard anything to suggest there is an engagement on the way.Just look at the nonsense KN writes:-and the editors don`t blush putting them to print.

    KM and PW are continuing to date as they were doing 5 years ago and PW is doing more and more royal duties ,period.
    However Iam willing to hear from anybody who can give reason as to why they believe there is an engagement on the way whichever the year(2010,2011,2012…2014….).

  • P
    November 24th, 2009 15:11
    186

    sall, I agree about the “talking/writing to sell” it seems to be a sequence of stories the press tell for generations more or less like: ‘when they will marry’, so they marry and the news will be ‘is she pregnancy?’, the children born and then starts the rumors about the end of marriage. I love to follow this but, honestly, I think I know very well what I will read and hear for the next 20 years.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 15:27
    187

    The editors know Kate Middleton sells.

    Just look at the last example: Hello Magazine front cover is Kate Middleton, pushed to a corner Princess Anne.

    Accordingly of what I’ve heard the real interesting article is Princess Anne interview and walk through at the Buckingham Palace.

    Now if I where the editor and I placed the cornered photo of Princess Anne as she appears, would it be appeasable to the public to purchase? I don’t think so.

    peach

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 15:28
    188

    I meant to say Princess Anne as front main cover instead of pushed to the corner, would it be appeasable to the public to purchase? I don’t think so.

    plum

  • Clover
    November 24th, 2009 15:33
    189

    I definately think putting Kate on the cover of Hello! was to sell magazines. People probably thought the article contained unknown information about Prince William and a wedding.

    orange

  • really?
    November 24th, 2009 16:14
    190

    Lost without her sounds strong but he gains strength from being around her and feels more grounded when other things in his life aren’t going so well.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 16:34
    191

    really? At Raffles ‘photographed’ alone hands clasped like Dr. Spock (hahaha). Do we have any photos of him in this postures when with Kate? I’ve tried, but can’t find.

    Are they soul mates?

    Jesus, I’m sounding like our mysterious Ked.

    pear

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 16:37
    192

    What I mean to say, I’ve seen photos of them giving the V sign (finger) right hand (both at the same time) to their chest, making the 7 second walk to the car, and off they went. The she in front, he right behind her, both looking like brother and sister, say the years make you have the same habits as the other?!

    plum

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 16:39
    193

    Are you giving the bots hints?

    Athens

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 16:53
    194

    The ‘bots’ referring for robots? Anyway, whoever the bots are, they may write something new and refreshing about soul mates and long term couples that have or end up having similar ‘behaviours’!

    I mean even dogs apparently on the long run imitate their owner (master). My dog jogs, swims and practically is an identical Me in the dog race!

    Perhaps the corgis? or Anne’s dogs, no no don’t think she bites.

    plum

  • kd
    November 24th, 2009 17:03
    195

    Me, Clover, & Pheobe – you guys/gals are funny!

    grape

  • Clover
    November 24th, 2009 17:17
    196

    Kd,
    Thanks! :)

    berry

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 17:24
    197

    I meant the spam bots. Why are you giving the anti-spam word in all your posts?

  • benny
    November 24th, 2009 18:25
    198

    You guys are cracking me up. I bet these two know exactly what they are up to. We just have to be patient until they decide to let us in on it.

  • sojourner
    November 24th, 2009 18:25
    199

    Phoebe,
    definitely something fishy is going on with the poster who is currently signing “Me.”

    Tomato
    Radish
    Okra
    Lemongrass
    Lemongrass

    :lol:

  • kat
    November 24th, 2009 19:01
    200

    I think Me got her information from a gossip website. If I am wrong, I apologize. One of the comments had to do with the 2012 date being all wrong. This person is quoted as saying the prenup has been signed. The wedding will take place the theird week in May. Scroll down through the comments.

    http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2009/11/23/new-rumors-circulate-that-prince-william-is-planning-to-marry-kate-middleton-in-2012/

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 19:22
    201

    Sojo, its Me really Me. Perhaps to much coffee lately :) Am a coffee lover.

    Actually I’m all excited for the first time after 5-6 years of the engagement rumours. Why? I have no inside info, just the vibes, feeling, yes. Anyway if any contrary results – won’t have a meltdown. I can almost guarantee 99.9 that Miss Kate is as strong as Superman without the green stuff near him.

    Oh the plum, Steve shall you change the season’s antispam for christmas, snow flake, mince pie, turke, pudding, yum yum.

  • Me
    November 24th, 2009 19:24
    202

    Yes Kat, that’s the link and I got it from someone who had posted it at the TIF.

    pear, reminds me of Bea.

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 20:30
    203

    Sojourner, (smile). Just got it. Little slow.

    Ottery St. Catchpole

  • jj
    November 24th, 2009 22:18
    204

    And as they said there Me pre-nups are not big in the uk. I have no idea if Diana and Fergie signed one or Autumn Kelly for that matter. Would Kate have to sign one?? I don’t believe that this info is true. Who on earth would worth risking their jobs… If that were what was going on only a certain few people who would know and all of their jobs would be a risk for leaking that type of information.

  • bluefire
    November 24th, 2009 23:05
    205

    i think that hello magazine put the cover of kate middleton is because a lot of people been buying of hello if she on the cover anyone who have hello can you scan it for me thanks here are some new news links about pw

    update

    http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/royalwatch/news/article_1514877.php/Prince-William-delays-trip

  • Phoebe
    November 24th, 2009 23:12
    206

    With regard to pre-nuptial agreements: apparently they were only found to be legally enforceable in the UK this year. On the other hand, there are pre-nups and then there are pre-nups: I understand that Mary Donaldson signed one before she married Fred which did not deal with money, but which said that she would no seek custody of any children if they ever divorced. But it is correct that anyone party to the proceedings who would reveal such information would be at risk of firing, at best, or disbarment at worst.

    Copenhagen

  • really?
    November 25th, 2009 09:56
    207

    I am almost certain their would be a prenup. They were the rage amongst the aristocrats in the Queen mothers day and so this tradition would have been passed down I am sure.

  • kd
    November 25th, 2009 10:29
    208

    Maybe PW & KM pre-nup states that KM cannot divorce PW on any grounds!! :)

  • Hale
    November 25th, 2009 13:11
    209

    Ked, you of all people. I have just read what you are suggesting. I believe it when I read it in the papers.

    If memory serves me well there was that kind of speculation this time last year.